My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004688 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MANTHEY
>
12833
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0400646
>
SU0004688 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:06 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:05:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0004688
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0400646
STREET_NUMBER
12833
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MANTHEY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
APN
19123007
ENTERED_DATE
11/3/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
12833 S MANTHEY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/2/2004 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MANTHEY\12833\PA-0400646\SU0004688\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
u _ SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Z ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> ' 304 E Weber Avenue 3" Floor Stockton •CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420•Far.(209)464-0138• Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: 1 2 j.t "-+ F7 ti I>"d_ � L,4.71 f`l s Jt PA#: <br /> REPORT DATE: <br /> I = Sufficient <br /> Insufficient <br /> San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> I = InsutLcient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> J <br /> �Q{ ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> �5 U ❑ L2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> may' 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> Pgs� u ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional Flow and gradient. <br /> I ' 4 ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> I site. <br /> p,,g ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> / to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> lam' <br /> {qr lr" i ❑ ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> Q ,s ❑ ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> 1 b ❑ ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> {,1 V ❑ ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> P. r U ❑ ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> fl,21 ❑ ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ❑ ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices Contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: S 2 u(e <br /> EHD 2"2-W2 Page 1 of surrec«sub checklist <br /> 7/142003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.