Laserfiche WebLink
KLEINFELDER <br /> i <br /> The CVRWQCB expressed concerns that detection limits for hexavalent chromium ranged from <br /> 50 to 500 parts per billion (ppb) in comparison to the water quality goal of 21 ppb. In addition, <br /> the CVRWQCB requested that a sample of storm water to be collected from the site and <br /> analyzed for TPH-diesel and hexavalent chromium. <br /> 4 RESPONSE ACTION <br /> The parent material (concrete tile) and six shallow soil samples were re-evaluated by the <br /> analytical laboratory (Sequoia Analytical) in regards to method detection limits (MDLs) which <br /> are lower than the reporting limit and closer to the water quality goal for hexavalent chromium of <br /> 21 ppb. The MDL for the six soil samples and parent material rinseate ranged from 25 to 250 <br /> ppb. These MDL values represent estimated limits for hexavalent chromium concentrations for <br /> the soil and parent material samples submitted for analysis. A MDL of 25 ppb was reached in <br /> the sample of the parent material (Ll-PM) and 25 ppb in one soil sample location (Ll-0"). No <br /> �. hexavalent chromium was detected in either of those samples. Hexavalent chromium was also <br /> not detected in any of the other samples collected from the site with MDLs of 250 ppb. <br /> According to the analytical laboratory, detection limits lower than 25 ppb could not be reached <br /> 6. due to matrix interference. Please note, soil reporting limits are typically higher than water <br /> reporting limits and as such, soil sampling reporting limits are not usually at or below water <br /> quality goals for a representative contaminant. Partly for this reason, soil reporting limits are not <br /> typically compared to water quality goals. <br /> On April 4, 2005 Kleinfelder collected a grab water sample directly from puddled water located <br /> approximately in the center of the site (Plate 1). The puddle resulted from a rain fall event that <br /> occurred on April 3, 2005. The sample was labeled, stored in a cooler with ice, and transported <br /> by courier to California Laboratory Services (CLS) of Rancho Cordova, California. <br /> No hexavalent chromium or diesel was detected by the laboratory in the stormwater sample <br /> collected from the subject site. A reporting limit of 1 ppb was reached during the analysis for <br /> hexavalent chromium. <br /> This addendum letter is subject to the limitations presented at the end of this letter. Any other <br /> party (other than KSN or regulatory agencies having enforcement jurisdiction for the site) who <br /> would like to use this document shall notify Kleinfelder, Inc. of such intended use in writing. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> No hexavalent chromium was detected by the laboratory re-evaluation of the two samples in <br /> which the MDL was 25 ppb. Included in these two samples was the parent material rinseate, <br /> the most likely source for constituents of concern (Chromium VI and TPH-D) to impact soil and <br /> groundwater at the site. Based on the parent material (concrete tile) sampling results, it appears <br /> that the parent material does not contain hexavalent chromium at concentrations near the water <br /> ` quality goal of 21 ppb. <br /> 52495.EO1/ST05R540/FB:Iv Page 3 of 5 <br /> 0 2005 Kleinfelder,Inc. May 27,2005 <br />