My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006350 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MANTHEY
>
8853
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600651
>
SU0006350 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:32:21 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:05:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006350
PE
2691
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600651
STREET_NUMBER
8853
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MANTHEY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
FRENCH CAMP
APN
19320006
ENTERED_DATE
12/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8853 S MANTHEY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
12/19/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MANTHEY\8853\PA-0600651\SU0006350\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY -" <br /> i ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> •• 304 E Weber Avenue 3`d Floor Stockton ■CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420•Fax:(209)4640138•Web:www.co.san ioaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: ^3 PA#: o <br /> REPORT DATE: ( -- <br /> s = Sufficient San Joaquin County p <br /> I = Insufficient 4 ty Develo ment Title chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S 1 1.0 CHEMiCAL.AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> i <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. 19). s, <br /> 12- <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> `a 3, Al L , <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS ^ <br /> ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. tq,'�y, <br /> E71- ❑ 2.2 Description1discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues i �� <br /> site. n the general rat location of <br /> p <br /> the <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> I <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER J <br /> E ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the 111 <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. y -4- <br /> 3.2 <br /> i-3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. . <br /> �r �I�.u.t�.y A '�"!':,7i! of L <br /> L - ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. y ru L- <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate # <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ <br /> 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore,or other appropriate formulalmodel,if applicable. pd 7 Al <br /> L� ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc.r q, `7 iV I- <br /> 4.0 <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. r° -7 N L <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed 10 mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern.at and/or around the proiect site. n on c O-j 7 L <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> L ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑� ❑.� 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By:� ,7 <br /> _ Reviewed Date: c,7 <br /> Erro2"2.002 Page 1 of <br /> 7!142003 Surface&Sub Checklist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.