My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006507 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MANTHEY
>
8853
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0700116
>
SU0006507 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:32:28 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:05:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006507
PE
2666
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0700116
STREET_NUMBER
8853
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MANTHEY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
FRENCH CAMP
APN
19320006
ENTERED_DATE
4/5/2007 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8853 S MANTHEY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
4/3/2007 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MANTHEY\8853\PA-0700116\SU0006507\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3a aUI C 1 1 <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3rd Floor Stockton-CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420•Fax:(209)464-0138• Web:www.co.san joaquin.ca.uslehd <br /> �lfio�a <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LocAmw _ �3 _ l (21 PA �C& 0c) _— <br /> _ REPORT DATE: Z <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County p p <br /> I = Insufficienf q ty Develo ment Title Chapter 9.1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL.AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> a ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. ��� 5, gS�, <br />! ED—❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site.,, <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> ❑� ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. �+ r f P w <br /> � S ,5 <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> f ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> 0�0 <br /> 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ED-` ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. P &f N <br /> D ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. ,,� S-LNL'.l 6a /c-,- <br /> 3.5 <br /> 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore,or other appropriate formulalmodel,if applicable. pp 7 N e-I/Lc�io <br /> ❑/ ❑ 3,6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc.r q> -7 N I- <br /> 4.0 <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> �- <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> i <br /> ED' <br /> ❑ <br /> 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project, e� -,k ril L• <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> F <br /> andlor any other constituent of concem;at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. 17v-k- <br /> ❑� 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> i <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: 3 7 07 <br /> EHD 26.02-002 Page I of 2 <br /> 7na12003 surface k sub Checklist 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.