My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0000651
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MCBRIDE
>
22802
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-93-120
>
SU0000651
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2019 2:37:22 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:08:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0000651
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-93-120
STREET_NUMBER
22802
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MCBRIDE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
ESCALON
ENTERED_DATE
9/24/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
22802 S MCBRIDE AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MCBRIDE\22820\MS-93-120\SU0000651\CDD OK.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUh,.- <br /> r. s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ITEM N0. 5.a. 6 b. <br /> is m <br /> ' 1810 E.HAZELTON AVE.,STOCKTON,CA 952056232 <br /> •C1<�Fb M~`' PHONE:209/46&3120 Fax:2091468-3163 <br /> January 20, 1994 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Planning Commission <br /> FROM: Thomas M. Gau, Senior Civil Engineer <br /> Development Services/Engineering Division '0 <br /> SUBJECT: MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION NO.'s. MS-93-120 and MS-93-121 OF G.L. AND M.J. <br /> BARTON (C/O MOYER CONSULTING) (SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 5) <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission: <br /> 1. Deny Minor Subdivision Application No.'s.MS-93-120 and MS-93-121 based upon the inability <br /> to make Findings No. 1 and 2. <br /> FINDINGS: <br /> 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and <br /> Special Purpose Plan, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. <br /> • This Finding cannot be made because the applications are Inconsistent with <br /> Agricultural Objective No. 1: <br /> 'To protect agricultural lands needed for the continuation of commercial <br /> agricultural enterprises,small-scale farming operations, and the preservation <br /> of open space.' <br /> Due to the fact that the owner Is proposing to create a total of four homesite parcels <br /> with these two Minor Subdivision applications and has also created two homesite <br /> parcels for himself under two previous subdivision applications (DL-72-210 and PM- <br /> 83-32), these applications will further fragment agricultural land. <br /> 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and <br /> any applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan. <br /> • This Finding cannot be made because the applications are Inconsistent with <br /> Agricultural Objective No. 1: <br /> 'To protect agricultural lands needed for the continuation of commercial <br /> agricultural enterprises,small-scale farming operations, and the preservation <br /> of open space.' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.