SU0011430 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attachment "A" Previously Approved Findings for Major Subdivision Application No. PA-0500143 1. The proposed subdivisions are consistent with the General Plan, the Master Plan, Specific Plan III, any applicable Special Purpose Plan, the Public Financing Plan, and any other adopted plan adopted by the County. This finding can be made because the analysis contained in the staff report has shown that the proposed subdivisions, applicable Mitigation Measures from the EIR and conditions of approval assure consistency with all applicable adopted plans 2. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivisions are consistent with the General Plan, the Master Plan, Specific Plan III, and any applicable Special Purpose Plan. This finding can be made because the design and improvements of the proposed subdivisions described in the project applications and the project descriptions of the staff report, meet the requirements of the General Plan, Master Plan (as amended for the project), and Specific Plan III. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivisions provide a variety of housing opportunities for future residents as evidenced by the size, number, and variable lot sizes for medium density residential development, and the parcels set aside for residential medium-high density residential development. The three subdivisions separately and collectively meet the residential density requirements of adopted plans. They each incorporate a coordinated system of auto, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities that provide efficient access to commercial and public destinations (e.g., K-8 school, Neighborhood Park, Community Park and other open space corridors) both within Specific Plan III and the Mountain House Master Plan area. The subdivisions include a hierarchy of roadways capable of accommodating the transportation needs of the land uses proposed. Individually and collectively the subdivisions contribute to the creation of distinctive and livable residential developments within each designated neighborhood and reinforce the importance of education by featuring the K-8 schools as a neighborhood focal point design element. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivisions have also been found to be consistent with MHCSD adopted plans and programs (e.g., MHCSD Design Manual and MHCSD Roadway Landscape Plans). 3. The sites are physically suitable for the type of development proposed. This finding can be made because the sites are physically suitable to accommodate the proposed residential, commercial, and institutional uses (e.g., K-8 school, Neighborhood Park, Community Park and other open space corridors). This analysis is based on the improvements proposed; the assessment of the hydrology and water quality of the site; and the absence of potential, significant impacts to biological resources within the project site. 4. The sites are physically suitable for the proposed density of development. This finding can be made because the area proposed for development is adequate in size to accommodate the density of development, consistent with the Master Plan (as amended for the project) Specific Plan III and Development Title, as amended. To the extent that there are any inconsistencies the conditions of approval contained in appendices 10, 11 and 12 assure compliance with stated requirements.