My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006227
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
22261
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600127
>
SU0006227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2019 12:22:30 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:17:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0006227
PE
2620
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600127
STREET_NUMBER
22261
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
22261 S MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
RECEIVED_DATE
8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY\22261\PA-0600127\SU0006227\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
985
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED MACHADO TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY <br /> SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> The SPIIIEIR identified five drainage and water quality impacts. Three, involving increased <br /> erosion and sedimentation, dewatering during construction, and long-term water quality <br /> effects of urban runoff',were determined to be less than significant. The following two <br /> impacts were determined to be potentially significant: <br /> Impact 4.7-2: Result in Flooding or Exceed the Capacity of the Storm-drain <br /> System. [Specific Plan III development] would increase the rate and amount of _ <br /> surface runoff and both increase the demand for capacity in the existing downstream <br /> MHMP storm-drain system and require the development of new storm-drain facilities <br /> to serve the [development]. However, this would not result in flooding or exceeding <br /> the capacity of the MHMP storm-drain system because the existing downstream <br /> MHMP storm-drain system has already been sized to accommodate runoff from the <br /> [development]. [New] projects would provide adequate capacity in the new storm- _ <br /> drain facilities required to serve [the new projects]. A less-than-significant impact <br /> would occur. [Specific Plan III development] would require expansion of WQB No. <br /> I and, if not completed before development, a significant impact would occur. <br /> Impact 4.8-1: Water Quality—Potential Temporary Construction-Related <br /> Water Quality Effects. Temporary construction-related disturbances within the <br /> [Specific Plan III area] could result in the discharge of contaminated stormwater and <br /> non-stormwater discharges to drainage systems and ultimately the Mountain House <br /> Creek channel and Old River. A potentially significant impact would occur. <br /> MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIHEIR <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.7-2 requires developers of Specific Plan III to expand WQB No 1 as <br /> required to accommodate runoff from their proposed projects or provide on-site retention <br /> storage in lieu of the WQB No. 1 expansion. Mitigation Measure 4.8-1 requires developers <br /> of Specific Plan III to prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) that <br /> include effective Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control polluted water discharges <br /> during construction. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce potential — <br /> flooding and temporary construction-related water quality impacts to a less-than-significaut <br /> levels. <br /> DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? <br /> During construction of the proposed project, grading operations would result in the removal _ <br /> of vegetation and topsoil and create the potential for erosion of on-site soils and off-site <br /> siltation. The project applicant would have to comply with the Phase I National Pollutant <br /> Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. Among other things, the Phase I <br /> NPDES program regulates storm water discharges from large and medium-sized municipal <br /> separate storm sewer systems (those serving more than 100,000 persons) and construction <br /> sites that disturb five or more acres of land. Under the program, developers of projects that <br /> 4-44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.