My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006226
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
22261
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600161
>
SU0006226
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2019 2:19:14 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:18:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0006226
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600161
STREET_NUMBER
22261
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
22261 S MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
RECEIVED_DATE
8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY\22261\PA-0600161\SU0006226\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
996
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED MACHADO TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKUST <br /> 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY <br /> disturb five acres or more of land are required prepare a SWPPP to implement BMPs to <br /> reduce the off-site impacts of sediment-laden runoff(EDAW,2005b). In addition,MHMP <br /> Policies 4.2.2(a)and(b)requires control of runoff, erosion, and sedimentation during <br /> grading. MHMP Policy 6.8.3(b)requires that adequate efforts be made to control or <br /> eliminate soil erosion and sedimentation associated with construction activities. <br /> V <br /> Upon completion of construction of the proposed project, existing WQB No.1 would treat <br /> storm water runoff from the proposed project prior to discharge to Mountain House Creek <br /> and Old River. WQB No. 1 would help to settle out sediment and particulates from runoff, as <br /> %W well as trace metals,nutrients and hydrocarbons,as these pollutants tend to adhere to soil <br /> 44„ particles. WQB No. 1 would require periodic maintenance including desilting,vegetation <br /> clearing, and trash and debris removal. A Maintenance and Operations Manual for WQB No. <br /> 1 has been prepared by the Mountain House Community Services District(MHCSD)as <br /> �- required by the MHMP(EDAW,2005b). <br /> MHMP Policy 15.7 (Implementation [a]) states that Mountain House(i.e.,the MHCSD) shall <br /> implement a long-term Storm Water Management Plan(SWMP)to reduce the discharge of <br /> �. pollutants from the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable and protect water <br /> quality in the receiving waters. At a minimum,the MHMP states that the SWMP shall <br /> include the following elements: (1)public education and outreach on storm water impacts; <br /> (2)public involvement/participation; (3)illicit discharge detection and elimination; <br /> �. (4)construction site storm water runoff control; (5)post-construction storm water <br /> management; and(6)pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations. <br /> West Yost and Associates prepared a SWMP for the MHCSD in April 2001. The SWMP <br /> %W identifies a list of water quality BMPs and provides recommendations for the MHCSD's <br /> `, storm water quality ordinance. A storm water quality ordinance has not been adopted by the <br /> %W MHCSD,but will be when the State of California designates the Mountain House <br /> Community as a Phase II MS4 area(Karam,2006). <br /> Vr <br /> %W Mitigation Measures <br /> %' With implementation of the mitigation measures and policies cited above, there would be no <br /> v, violation of any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The impact of the <br /> proposed project would be less than significant. No additional mitigation measures are <br /> required. <br /> `, b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater <br /> ` recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the <br /> local groundwater table level(e.g., the production rate ofpre-existing nearby wells <br /> Iftw would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for <br /> `, which permits have been granted)? <br /> %W No groundwater would be used for the proposed project's water supply,so the project would <br /> *ar not substantially deplete groundwater supplies. The Initial Study for the SPIIIEIR states that <br /> %, complete development of Specific Plan III(including the proposed project)would result in <br /> covering less than 0.2 percent of the Tracy groundwater subbasin with impervious surfaces. <br /> This would result in a negligible reduction in percolation to the subbasin as a whole. <br /> 445 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.