Laserfiche WebLink
1,. MouNTAiN House PROPOsED MAcnADo TENTAnvE MAP 4. ENviRoNMENTAL CHe=sr <br /> 4.15 TKMSPORTAnON/heAPP[c <br /> L <br /> %W <br /> %, DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> %W a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load <br /> `,. and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the <br /> number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at <br /> intersections)? <br /> and <br /> b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by <br /> the county congestion management agency or designated roads or highways? <br /> %W <br /> `, The proposed project includes 315 dwelling units housing approximately 900 residents. <br /> These residents would drive cars that would contribute to the traffic analyzed in the <br /> SPIIIEIR. Complete development of the residential land uses in Specific Plan III are <br /> �. projected to generate 1,595 morning(AM)peak-hour vehicle trips and 2,180 afternoon(PM) <br /> ` peak-hour trips(EDAW,2005b,Table 4.11-7). Specific Plan III includes 2,240 dwelling <br /> units housing approximately 6,100 people(EDAW, 2005a,Table 3-13). Since the proposed <br /> project would house approximately 900 residents,it is reasonable to assume that the residents <br /> .. of the proposed project would generate approximately 15 percent of these trips. <br /> The proposed project also includes 256,130 square feet(sf)of commercial and office space <br /> %W and 975,800 sf of limited industrial space located on the east side of the project site fronting <br /> Mountain House Parkway(Associated Engineering, 2006). Complete development of the <br /> commercial, office and limited industrial land uses in Specific Plan III are projected to <br /> generate 1,152 morning(AM)peak-hour vehicle trips and 1,329 afternoon(PM)peak-hour <br /> trips (EDAW, 2005b,Table 4.11-7). Specific Plan III includes 1,775,590 sf of commercial, <br /> office and limited industrial space(EDAW,2005a,Table 3-1). Therefore,it is reasonable to <br /> assume that people driving to and from these areas in the proposed project would generate <br /> approximately 69 percent of these trips. <br /> The transportation impacts of the Specific Plan III were analyzed in the context of cumulative <br /> projected growth in San Joaquin County by 2025. For this analysis,the estimated growth in <br /> the Mountain House Community at 2025 buildout was added to forecasts of housing and <br /> r. employment in the remainder of San Joaquin County and the surrounding region,including <br /> %, the nine-county Bay Area, the four-county Sacramento area,and Stanislaus County. Traffic <br /> improvements that were approved as part of the approval of Neighborhoods E,F,and G are <br /> considered part of the background roadway system in this analysis(EDAW,2005b). <br /> Table 4.15-1 presents the peak-hour trips that would be generated after the Mountain House <br /> Community is built-out in 2025. Approximately 45 percent of the peak-hour trips would be <br /> internal trips that originate and end within the Mountain House Community and 55 percent <br /> would be external trips that originate or end outside the Mountain House Community. <br /> 4-79 <br />