SU0009893 SSCRPT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Identified Contamination Source Evaluation & Recommendations 4. One 500-gallon above-ground The tank was installed five years ago and diesel storage tank is located in a has had no problems, according to Mr. pump house near the northeast Lagorio. Nevertheless, it is possible that corner of the Site, the diesel fuels petroleum products and related chemicals the irrigation well. Live Oak did not could exist in the on-Site soils. The only inspect the tank as it was located way to determine the presence or within the closed pump house. absence of these chemicals is by testing (Current on-site) and analysis. Typically, any such testing is conducted at the property owner's discretion. Above-ground storage tanks should be maintained in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. 5 Three pole-mounted transformers Transformers are of concern because the were observed on the Site. All the oil within them may contain PCBs, which transformers appeared relatively can contaminate soil in the event of a new, but a blue sticker�n5icating the leak. The property owner may wish to transformer is free of contact the utility provider regarding the �'i.2 i 3,3•f J) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) PCB content of the unlabeled was only observed on one. (Current transformers and any recommended on-site) action. 6 Agricultural irrigation infrastructure Old concrete irrigation pipes may contain may be present on the Site from asbestos. If any such pipes are to be past farming operations. (Current disturbed, the asbestos content should be and past on-site) determined, and any material found to contain asbestos should be dealt with in accordance with local, State, and Federal regulations. 7. In the 1930s or earlier through at Lead-based paint may have been present least the 1960s, several structures in the former structures on the Site. were located at the southwest leading to the potential presence of lead corner of the Site. Mr. Lagorio in the soil surrounding these structures. indicated that he had heard about a The ground beneath the former structures barn in that location, but he is not may have been treated with aware of any wells, septic systems, environmentally persistent pesticides. or other infrastructure there. (Past The property owner should consider on-site) these possibilities before disturbing soil in the vicinity of the former structures. Although the owner has not observed any underground infrastructure in the area, the possibility of its existence cannot be ruled out. LOGE 1316 Page 7