Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> 1 : 06.7 Discussion of Any Potential Problems Predicted and/Or the Need for An Engineered or <br /> Alternative Septic System: In this area, the soils are classified as Archerdale Clay Loam, Cogna <br /> Loam, Finerod Clay Loam, San Joaquin Sandy Loam, San Joaquin Complex, and Vignolo Silt Loam. <br /> l . Due to this classification and percolation rates, a standard septic system similar to the ones found <br /> on the other homesites would be recommended on all four parcels. <br /> .8 Discussion of Percolation Rates in Relation to the Type, Size and Location of future leach <br /> fields at the site: Based on the results of the percolation rates and the soils profile, it is Dillon & <br /> Murphy's opinion that the subject proposed parcels 1, 2, 3, and the Designated Remainder are <br /> i suited for a typical on-site sewage disposal systems. These systems should be properly designed <br /> and installed according to the current San Joaquin County criteria for standard septic systems. <br /> Based on the depth to groundwater in the area, and the size of the proposed parcels, it is our opinion <br /> that the installation of any new proposed septic system, if properly installed, should not adversely <br /> affect the quality of groundwater in the area. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> r ' The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed <br /> p <br /> development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the time we <br /> excavated our test holes and performed the percolation tests. It was assumed that the test holes and <br /> percolation tests results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> Our services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in accordance <br /> + with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other <br /> warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional opinion do <br /> Fnot constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> F4" <br /> Q�OFESsrCy <br /> t1Rpyfie <br /> Y <br /> oe urphy <br /> k <br /> Na. 77 / R.C. . 45,277 <br /> 4,521 �/ <br /> sl CIV1ti �P <br /> 9 OF C <br /> FF <br /> r <br /> 4 <br /> } c:1094215oil suitability Report June,2010 <br />