Laserfiche WebLink
March 8, 2005 <br /> NOA PROJECT NUMBER E04070B <br /> 5.0 OTHER WASTE STREAMS <br /> Domestic wastewater is discharged to a septic system that is permitted by San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department. Domestic wastewater is not co-mingled with the process <br /> water. <br /> 6.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS <br /> Groundwater was sampled from the domestic well at the site. It contained a concentration of 4.0 <br /> mg/L of nitrate as nitrogen. The toxicity objective in the Basin Plan applies to all groundwater, <br /> which states; in part"ground waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in <br /> concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or <br /> aquatic life associated with the designated beneficial uses." The cancer potency factor for oral <br /> exposure to chloroform in this database is 0.031 mg/kg body weight per day. This concentration <br /> is equivalent to a concentration in drinking water of 1.1 µg/L (ppb) at the 1 in-a-million-cancer <br /> risk level. Chloroform was detected in MPF's wastewater at less than .05 to 35.6 gg/L in 2004, <br /> well in excess of the I.1 Vg/L human toxicity value. Now with the treatment process in effect, <br /> the concentrations are projected to be much smaller. <br /> 7.0 BASIN PLAN,BENEFICIAL USES, AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS <br /> State.Water Resources Control Board(State Board) Resolution No 68-16 requires that the <br /> discharge meet waste discharge requirements.whi.ch will result in Best Practices Terminal <br /> Control (BPTC) of the discharge to assure that pollution or nuisance will not occur and the <br /> highest water quality consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of the United States be <br /> maintained. <br /> Background groundwater conditions are not et defined at the and or land application area as <br /> g g Y p pp <br /> the specific quality of the wastewater has not been characterized. If the discharge will cause an <br /> increase then the discharger may be required to cease the discharge, implement source control, <br /> change the method of disposal or take other action as needed to prevent ground water <br /> degradation. This order establishes effluent limitations that are protective of the beneficial uses <br /> of the underlying groundwater and requires groundwater monitoring to evaluate whether the <br /> discharge of waste is impacting the groundwater quality. <br /> 8.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN (OMP) <br /> Excessive application of food processing wastewater to land application areas can create <br /> objectionable odors, soil conditions that are harmful to crops, and degradation of underlying <br /> groundwater by overloading the shallow soils profile and causing waste or soil constituents <br /> (organic carbon, nitrate, dissolved solids, and metals)to percolate below the root zone. If <br /> sufficient information becomes available, this OMP may be revised to further reduce the loading <br /> rates as appropriate. If the MPF is unable to modify its waste stream or application methods <br /> such that groundwater quality will not be impacted,then the Board would be required to classify <br /> the waste as designated waste and require full containment under Title 27 of the CA Code of <br /> Regulations (CCR), Division 2, Subdivision 1, beginning with Section 20005 (hereafter Title <br /> 27) <br /> 3 <br />