Laserfiche WebLink
u <br /> IN <br /> 21390 Johnson Road <br /> PO Box 784 v�;`y e0Q'? <br /> Clements CA 95227 <br /> San Joaquin County Community Development Department M1/ <br /> Development Services Division <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton CA 95205 <br /> February 14,2003 <br /> Re: Application#PA0300014(SA) <br /> Gentlemen: <br /> I wish to raise my voice in loud protest over this proposal. My primary residence—and that of my <br /> family—is two adjacent 20 acre agricultural propertied situated directly west of this proposed site. Despite <br /> our proximity (two lots away) we received no official notification of this project. This seems to ne the <br /> experience of most neighbors with whom I have discussed this matter, and it would appear that County <br /> procedures for giving adequate notice to the owners of rural properties in close proximity to such <br /> applications are inadequate. <br /> I raise the following objections: <br /> 1. Large quantities of urban yard refused being trucked to this site for composting would carry substantial <br /> and uncontrolled residues of urban pesticides, fertilizers, and other home and garden chemicals. The <br /> process of composting and natural decomposition would concentrate these materials and leach them <br /> down into the local water table,thus contaminating the wells that provide drinking water to my family <br /> as well as my livestock, as well as the runoff into local reservoirs and the Mokelumne River. As a <br /> practicing physician whose specific professional role is the care of cancer patients, I have been struck <br /> since arriving in San Joaquin County by the epidemiological excess incidence of uncommon cancers <br /> and cancers occurring at unusually young ages among residents of this County. It would be my <br /> medical observation that such epidemiological anomalies are frequently caused by exposure to r <br /> agricultural chemicals and pesticides,and both as a professional and as a homeowner I am unalterably <br /> opposed to circumstances—such as this proposal—that would substantially increase the environmental <br /> risk to my own family and livestock. <br /> 2. Use of this land as a damp for urban refuse would increase traffic on Johnson Road, the single access <br /> road to the property in question. Driven west from Highway 12, Johnson Road is a sequence of blind <br /> curves and hairpin turns with poor visibility,narrow shoulders and some areas of dropoff. It has been <br /> poorly maintained and is potholed. Driven east from Acampo Road, Johnson Road drops rapidly <br /> where Bear Creek crosses the road.This is flooded frequently during the Winter and Spring,and in our <br /> experience this dip has proved impassable for most large vehicles approaching our property from that <br /> side. Stagnant watershed running off the proposed project would prolong and intensify the periods of <br /> flooding at the site.The road is deemed sufficiently unsafe by Lodi Unified School District that school <br /> buses are not allowed onto Johnson Road to pick up or drop off our children. This proposal would <br /> increase traffic by vehicles of a size and weight for which these routes were neither designed nor <br /> maintained.This would be a significant and unconscionable public safety hazard to our children and to <br /> our livestock. <br /> 3. Our agricultural operation is dedicated to the breeding and raining of quarter horses and Shetland <br /> ponies. It is our belief that the increase in road traffic, and the inevitable noises and smells inherent in <br /> the operation of a dump site, would so negatively influence the local environment as to disrupt the <br /> normal exusfoaling cyc <br /> tysof oanimals. <br /> stwould <br /> cause irreparable <br /> damage <br /> as <br /> our <br /> ability tbreeding, <br /> eecte the businesssplan for thsopeatonand rsultin substantial financial losand <br /> wasting of assets. <br />