Laserfiche WebLink
HCMU0SigA8liz8d fDte[3ectiV0Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project HGVl Route 2 <br /> 6: BlevvettRVGd & Wetly Road 2/11/2004 <br /> -, `-v 4 �4� � � <br /> Lane Configurations Y t To <br /> Sign Control Stop Free Free <br /> Grade O% 0% U% <br /> Vo|unne (veh/A) 5 O 1 0 7 4 <br /> Peak Hour Factor 092 0.92 0.92 092 092 0.92 <br /> Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 U 1 9 8 4 <br /> Pedestrians <br /> Lane Width (ft) � <br /> Walking Speed (M/s) <br /> Percent Blockage <br /> Right turn flare (veh) <br /> Median type None <br /> Median storage veh) <br /> Upstream signal (ft) <br /> p}(. platoon unblocked <br /> vC. conflicting volume 21 10 12 <br /> vC1. stage I confvo| <br /> vC2, stage 2cmnfvol <br /> VCu, unblocked vol 21 10 12 <br /> tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 41 <br /> tC, 2stage(s) <br /> tF (s) 15 33 2.2 <br /> pVqueue free % 99 108 100 <br /> rMcapacity (veh/h) 890 1072 1607 <br /> Volume Left 5 1 O U <br /> Volume Right O O O 4 <br /> cSH 986 1607 1700 1700 <br /> Volume toCapacity 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 <br /> Queue Length (ft) O O O U <br /> Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.2 OO O-O <br /> Lane LOS 8 A <br /> Approach Delay (s) 8.6 0.8 0.0 <br /> Approach LOS A <br /> Average Delay 2.0 <br /> Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level ofService A <br /> Analysis Period (nnin) 16 <br /> Synchno0Report <br /> Peters Engineering Group Page <br />