Laserfiche WebLink
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> TABLE 2-1 (Continued) <br /> SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> LEVEL of <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES SIGNIFICANCE <br /> AFTER MITIGATION <br /> 4.9.2f For Phases of the Proposed Project that are located entirely <br /> within San Joaquin County,the applicant may be able to <br /> comply with the SJMSCP in lieu of implementing Mitigation <br /> Measures 4.9.2a-e. Complying with the SJMSCP would <br /> provide for pre-construction surveys,impact avoidance and <br /> minimization measures,and preservation of open space as <br /> mitigation. <br /> 4.9.3 The Proposed Project will not conflict with any No mitigation is required. <br /> applicable habitat conservation plan or natural <br /> community conservation plan. This would be a less- <br /> than-significant impact. <br /> 4.9.4 The Proposed Project will not have a substantial adverse No mitigation is required. <br /> effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural <br /> community identified in local or regional plans,policies, <br /> regulations or by the CDFG or USFWS. This would be <br /> a less-than-significant impact. <br /> 4.9.5 The Proposed Project will not interfere substantially No mitigation is required. <br /> with the movement of any native resident or migratory <br /> fish or wildlife species or with established native <br /> resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the <br /> use of native wildlife nursery sites. This would be a <br /> less-than-significant impact. <br /> 4.9.6 The Proposed Project will not conflict with any local No mitigation is required. <br /> policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. <br /> This would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> RMC Pacific Vema&Quany Mining and Reclamation Project 2-30 ESA/203015 <br /> Administrative Dmf(EIR <br /> March 2004 <br /> I I i <br />