Laserfiche WebLink
4. ENVMONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br /> L 4.4 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION <br /> ` TABLE 4,4-1 <br /> LEVEL OF SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS <br /> Average Vehicle Delay <br /> Level of Service Description (seconds) <br /> A Little or no delay 0-10 <br /> r. B Short traffic delays >10-15 <br /> C Average traffic delays >15-25 <br /> D Long traffic delays >25-35 <br /> E Very long traffic delays >35-50 <br /> F Stop-and-go conditions >50 <br /> It is typical on state highways and in Waal areas to require that a level of service of LOS C or <br /> ., better be maintained. In urban areas, LOS D is often considered acceptable. The Caltrans Guide <br /> for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies indicates that Caltrans endeavors to maintain a <br /> target level of service at the transition between LOS C and LOS D. <br /> The results of the existing intersection level-of-service calculations are shown in Table 4.4-2, and <br /> the analysis output is on-file and available for review at the San Joaquin County offices. Levels <br /> of service are presented for each intersection approach from which movements are controlled by <br /> stop signs; the level of service for the intersection as a whole is not defined because the major <br /> street traffic is not required to stop. The levels of service were determined using the computer <br /> program Synchro 6,which is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual procedures for <br /> calculating levels of service and which is listed in the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of <br /> Traffic Impact Studies as a commonly-used program. <br /> The results of the existing road segment level-of-service analyses are shown in Table 4.4-3. The <br /> Florida Department of Transportation has published tables correlating peak-hour volumes of <br /> roadway segments with levels of service. For this analysis,the table entitled"Fable 4-6, <br /> Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas"(Florida Department <br /> of Transportation, 2002)was used. The table is included in Appendix C. <br /> Freeway weaving and ramp junction analyses were performed at the study freeway interchanges. <br /> Those analyses evaluated the effect of traffic at the intersections of on/off ramps and mainline <br /> freeway segments and determined resulting levels of service at these locations. The analysis was <br /> performed using HCS2000 computer program for the future-with-project conditions at the study <br /> locations to identify the worst-case conditions based on the projected traffic. The analyses <br /> resulted in LOS C or better for all future-with-project conditions. The analysis sheets are on-file <br /> and available for review at San Joaquin County offices. <br /> RMC Pack Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 4.4-7 ESA/203015 <br /> Admhtistrelive Draft Eai March 2004 <br />