My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br /> 4.4 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION <br /> r Haul Route Option 1: All trucks entering and exiting the project site would use Blewett Road and <br /> Bird Road. Ten percent of trucks would travel on SR 132 west of Bird Road. Ninety percent of <br /> trucks access the SR 132/1-5 interchange. Seventy percent of trucks would travel on I-5 north of <br /> SR 132. Five percent of trucks would travel on I-5 south of SR 132. Fifteen percent of trucks <br /> would travel on SR 132 east of I-5. <br /> Haul Route Qption 2: Similar distribution to Haul Route Option 1, with the exception that trucks <br /> will have the option of using Koster Road for access to and from SR 132. In this case,it is <br /> anticipated that trucks leaving the site and traveling east on SR 132 will make right turns at <br /> Koster Road/SR 132. Trucks entering the site from the east may make left turns at Koster <br /> Road/SR 132. Trucks entering the site from I-5 north of SR 132 would likely travel east on <br /> SR 132 and tum right at Koster Road. Due to difficulties in making left turns,it is anticipated <br /> ` that few trucks would leave the site traveling northbound on Koster Road and making a left turn <br /> to westbound SR 132. <br /> ` The anticipated project traffic volumes and distribution are shown in Figures 7 through 10(in <br /> Appendix C)for Haul Route Options 1 and 2,respectively. <br /> Future (Year 2025) Traffic Volumes <br /> The San Joaquin County travel model is maintained by the San Joaquin County Council of <br /> Governments(SJCCOG). The model includes peak-hour directional travel volume estimates for <br /> the base year 1999 and for the future year 2025. Travel model data provided by SJCCOG is <br /> presented in Appendix C. The future peak-hour volumes were estimated base on the Increment <br /> y Method described in the Council of Fresno County Governments Recommended Procedures for <br /> Using Traffic Projections from the Fresno COG Travel Model dated January 2002. Although the <br /> Increment Method was developed for the Fresno County model,it is the opinion of Peters <br /> " Engineering Group that the methods are applicable to other travel models. The Increment <br /> Method estimates the future growth in traffic volumes by determining the difference between the <br /> r year 2025 travel model and the base year travel model volumes. This difference indicates the <br /> growth in traffic volumes that is predicted by the model between the base year and the year 2025. <br /> This growth is then added to the existing volumes determined by actual traffic counts. Future <br /> y turning movements were determined based on the methods presented in Chapter 8 of the <br /> Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 <br /> entitled "Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design." In some <br /> instances,the travel model predicted negative growth. Because travel models can be less reliable <br /> in rural areas, a minimum growth rate of 2.5% per year should be used even if the model predicts <br /> less as a conservative approach. Therefore, a minimum annual growth rate of 2.5 percent was <br /> maintained for each turning movement. <br /> Future traffic volumes without the project are presented in Figures 23 and 24(Appendix Q. <br /> Future-with-project traffic volumes are presented in Figures 25 through 28 for Haul Route <br /> Options I and 2(Appendix Q. <br /> RMC Pwis�vemahs Quany Ming end Red,,Ooo Prolan 4.4-13 ESA/203015 <br /> Adminisv ve Daft ERR Minch 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.