Laserfiche WebLink
4. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br /> 4.5 NOISE — <br /> receptors if a wall or berm impedes its line of site to the noise source. Mining noise would be _ <br /> more noticeable during nighttime hours when ambient noise levels are typically quieter. <br /> Mining noise could result in increased noise levels at three separate locations of nearby <br /> residences. The residence located adjacent to the northeast side of the site(along the south side <br /> of Blewett Road)would be most affected by mining noise generated at the northeast corner of <br /> Phase IV. A berm has not been proposed by the applicant along the eastern boundary of Phase _ <br /> IV. Assuming mining activity would generate noise levels as high as 91 dBA Leq at a distance of <br /> 50 feet,and a worst-case noise attenuation rate of six dBA for every doubling of distance,noise <br /> levels from mining operations located only 200 feet from the residence would attenuate to 79 — <br /> dBA Leq. As shown in Table 4.5-2,daytime noise levels at this residence are 58 dBA Leq on <br /> weekdays and 46 dBA L.eq on Saturdays, and night time noise levels are 48 dBA LeQ on both <br /> weekdays and Saturdays. Because the resultant noise level from excavation activity is — <br /> considerably higher than ambient daytime and nighttime levels, this would be a significant <br /> impact. <br /> The residence located west of the southern end of the project site on Koster Road(and across the <br /> Delta-Mendota Canal)would be most affected by the noise of mining activity on the west side of <br /> Phases III and V. Noise levels at this residence are 52-54 dBA Les during the daytime and 51- <br /> 52 dBA L eq at night,as shown by Measurement B in Table 4.5-2,and a berm has not been <br /> proposed by the applicant along the west sides of Phases III and V. Generated as close as 500 _ <br /> feet away,mining noise would attenuate to 71 dBA Leq at the property line of the residence. This <br /> would also be a potentially significant impact because mining noise would be considerably higher <br /> than ambient daytime and nighttime noise levels. _ <br /> The residence located south of Phase V(also across the Delta-Mendota Canal)would experience <br /> noise generated by mining activity, which would be as close as 800 feet. At this distance, mining <br /> noise would attenuate to 67.5 dBA Leq. Assuming the ambient noise environment at this <br /> residence is similar to the residence located west of the southern end of the project site,this <br /> would also be a significant impact. — <br /> In all three instances,however,the impact of the resultant noise level would lessen as excavation <br /> continues at lower depths; however,haul trips on-site would continue to generate noise at the — <br /> surface. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.5.1 and 4.5.2 would be necessary to reduce <br /> these noise impacts. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.5.1a: The Applicant shall do one of the following measures: <br /> a. Construct sound barriers along all sides of the project site that face off-site <br /> sensitive receptors that are located within 1,000 feet of the project site. This <br /> includes the perimeter of the project site except the eastern boundaries of <br /> Phases VI,VII,and VIII,and the southern boundary of Phase VI. The sound <br /> barriers must be at sufficient height to block the line of site to the nearest <br /> RMC Puirx Vemelis Quant'Mining and Reclamation Pmjecl 4.5-14 ESA/203015 <br /> Admioiamfiti a Ihaft ERR Minch 2004 <br />