Laserfiche WebLink
4. ENVIRONMFMAL ANALYSIS <br /> 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY <br /> destruction shall be designed to create a sanitary seal that would not conduct vertical <br /> water flow in the event that the well is truncated or damaged during mining operations. <br /> Significance after Mitigation: Less-than-Significant. <br /> Impact 4.8A: Groundwater extraction associated with the proposed project could lower <br /> groundwater levels in areas beyond the boundaries of the project site resulting in <br /> groundwater drawdown through the life of the project. Excessive groundwater level <br /> decline could deplete available groundwater resources by lowering local or regional <br /> groundwater levels below the current pumping depths of existing private or municipal <br /> groundwater supply wells. This would be a significant impact without mitigation <br /> prescribed as part of this EHL <br /> The proposed project would require water for aggregate processing,dust control,and <br /> landscaping. Under normal operations,the project applicant would generate the majority of its <br /> water supply from surface water decanted and recycled within a series of proposed silt <br /> settlement ponds. Groundwater would supplement the surface water and under normal <br /> operations,account for approximately 25 percent of their required process water supply. When <br /> surface water from settlement ponds is not available,groundwater would be the sole source of <br /> process water supply. Groundwater would be used exclusively,for example, during the initial <br /> phases of mining when aggregate extraction and processing is underway simultaneously with the <br /> establishment of the initial,temporary silt pond.10 During the life of the project, the applicant's <br /> operations may require that groundwater may be the only water supply source. However,such <br /> situations would be infrequent because the proposed project phasing and silt pond construction <br /> are expected to provide adequate available surface water storage for recycling. <br /> The estimated water demand for the proposed aggregate mining operations would range between <br /> 3.8 and 8.9 million gallons of water per day (mgd)depending on production quantities. This <br /> equates to approximately 2,600 to 6,200 gallons per minute(gpm). The two existing onsite <br /> agricultural wells and the one existing domestic well would provide the required 25 percent of <br /> this demand(between 950,000 and 2.2 million gallons) and provide the entire supply when <br /> recycled surface water is not available. The amount of groundwater extracted to supply this <br /> quantity could result in an adverse aquifer response including,but not necessarily limited to, <br /> extended periods of groundwater drawdown to the extent that lower groundwater levels would <br /> restrict other local water users from groundwater pumping. <br /> The city of Tracy,as well as other local municipal, agricultural, and industrial operations relies <br /> on groundwater as either a primary water supply or to supplement surface water entitlements <br /> 10 Once a silt pond is excavated,permeable aggregate material would be exposed on the bottom of the pond. Because <br /> of the high permeability of the underlying aggregate material,water entering the pond would seep vertically into the <br /> underlying gravels. Ile seepage would continue until the fine-grained silts discharged into the pond begin to settle <br /> into the pore spaces of the aggregate. As the fine-grained sediments accumulate,the pond bottom becomes less <br /> permeable and the infiltration volumes and rates reduce. <br /> RMC PadOc V.1i.Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 4.8-25 PSA/703015 <br /> Administrative unit EQt Mamh 2004 <br />