Laserfiche WebLink
Summary of Environmental Impacts <br /> TABLE ES-1 <br /> SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Level of Significance <br /> (Level of Significance Prior to Mitigation) After Mitigation <br /> Land Use <br /> 4.2.1 The Proposed Project has the potential to conflict with 4.2.1 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.4.1 a and b;4.4.3;4.4.4;4.5.1 a,b,c Less than Significant <br /> existing and planned land uses surrounding the project and d;4.5.2;4.5.3;4.6.1;4.6.2;4.6.4;and 4.12.2. <br /> site.This would be a potentially significant impact.(PS) <br /> 4.2.2 The project is consistent with applicable Land Use No mitigation is required. <br /> designations and policies.This would be a less-than- <br /> significant impact. (LS) <br /> 4.2.3 The Proposed Project could conflict with an applicable 4.2.3 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.9.2a—c. Less than Significant <br /> habitat conservation plan or natural community <br /> conservation plan. This would be a potentially significant <br /> impact.(PS) <br /> Agricultural Resources <br /> 4.3.1 Implementation of the Proposed Project would result in No mitigation is required. <br /> the disturbance of Prime Farmland and Farmland of <br /> Statewide Importance.This would be a less-than- <br /> significant impact.(LS) <br /> 4.3.2 The Proposed Project would not conflict with the current No mitigation is required. <br /> agricultural zoning of the subject properties nor with the <br /> provisions of an existing Williamson Act contract.This <br /> would be a less-than-significant impact.(LS) <br /> 4.3.3 Mining activities have the potential to result in offsite 4.3.3 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.6.1 to control the generation of Less than Significant <br /> impacts to adjacent agricultural lands.This would be a fugitive dust during mining activities Vineyards in the project and haul <br /> potentially significant impact.(PS) route vicinity would potentially be adversely affected by fugitive dust <br /> from project operations.A literature review has found that spider mite <br /> population increases in vineyards could be associated with increased <br /> dust levels(Costello,2004; Lodi-Woodbridge W negrape <br /> Commission,2002).Dust control measures incorporated at the <br /> project site and haul routes to reduce the total PM10 to below the <br /> CAACS would also reduce project related dust fallout on nearby <br /> vineyards.. <br /> Cemex Vemalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project ES-4 ESA 1203015 <br /> Final EnAronrnental Impact Report June 2009 <br /> I <br />