My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 5, 2006 <br /> Mr. Chandler Martin, Associate Planner — <br /> Page 4 <br /> TRAFFIC <br /> The Traffic Comment highlights the DEIR's transportation and circulation analysis major error _ <br /> in relying on obsolete and questionable traffic data. DEIR relies upon baseline information that <br /> appears to be as much as four years old, based on traffic counts that date back to the post- <br /> September 11, 2001 recession. As Smith points out, this analysis should be corrected with 2006 <br /> information, which is highly likely to demonstrate that the Project will have greater impacts on <br /> traffic than are disclosed by the DEIR. <br /> Also, like Fox and Pless, Smith notes the failure of the DEIR to consider the cumulative impact <br /> that would result if both the Project and the pending expansion proposal for West Coast A-3 <br /> Aggregates' Valley Rock quarry are approved. This also demonstrates a failure to disclose. <br /> Further, the questions raised by Fox and Pless regarding the actual production levels that <br /> might be permitted under the DEIR (see Air Quality Report, Comment IV) apply with equal <br /> force to the traffic analysis. To the extent that the DEIR's traffic analysis is based on <br /> production levels that may be greatly exceeded under the approval being sought, the traffic _ <br /> analysis fails to disclose the likely impacts of the Project. <br /> As with the air quality section, the transportation and circulation section of the DEIR <br /> requires significant revisions to provide adequate disclosure under CEQA. <br /> Conclusion <br /> The Project will have numerous highly significant impacts that are not adequately disclosed, <br /> analyzed, or mitigated in the DEIR. Based on the severity of the DEIR's errors and omissions, <br /> the DEIR should be supplemented to address the issues identified above and re-circulated to <br /> allow for public review. Without these revisions, the DEIR is inadequate under CEQA and <br /> should be relied upon by the Planning Commission for approval of the Project. Aa <br /> The residents will have little opportunity for recourse once this permit and its conditions of <br /> approval are approved. Accordingly, the Planning Commission must carefully analyze all <br /> proposed mitigation measures and make them part of the permit's conditions of approval before <br /> approving this Project. <br /> Thank you for considering our comments. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> A — <br /> Theodore Franklin <br /> TF/x <br /> Enclosures — <br /> 1131801426524 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.