Laserfiche WebLink
Table of Contents <br /> I. THE DRAFT EIR'S AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS IS NOT <br /> SUFFICIENTLY DOCUMENTED.......................................................................... I — <br /> 11. THE AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS IS FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED.................. 4 <br /> II.A The Draft EIR Did not Conduct any Analyses to Determine Compliance with some <br /> SignificanceCriteria............................................................................................................................... 4 <br /> 11.13 The Significance Criteria Are Incomplete........................................................................................ 5 — <br /> II.B.I The Significance of CO, PM 10, PM2.5, and SO2 Emissions Was Not Evaluated...... 5 <br /> 11.6.2 Short-Term Impacts Were not Evaluated......................................................................... 6 <br /> 11.6.3 Sole Reliance on Emission Thresholds Is not Adequate................................................ 7 <br /> III. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ARE SIGNIFICANT AND NOT <br /> ADEQUATELY MITIGATED ................................................................................. 7 — <br /> III.A Project Construction NOx Emissions Are Significant and Unmitigated................................... 8 <br /> 111.13 Project Construction Fugitive Dust PM 10 Emissions Remain Significant after — <br /> Implementation of SJVAPCD's Regulation VIII................................................................................ I <br /> III.0 Additional Feasible Measures Exist and Should Be Required to Mitigate Construction <br /> PM10 Impacts.......................................................................................................................................... 13 — <br /> III.C.I Project Construction PMI 0 and NOx Emissions Remain <br /> Significant after Mitigation..................................................................................................... 14 <br /> III.C.2 All Feasible Fugitive PMIO Mitigation Measures Were not Required........................ 15 — <br /> IV. PROJECT OPERATIONAL IMPACTS ARE UNDERESTIMATED .................... 19 <br /> IV.A Emission Estimates Must Be Based on Maximum Potential Production Rate.......................... 20 <br /> IV.A.I Operating Hours.................................................................................................................... 20 <br /> IV.A.2 Quarry Production Rate...................................................................................................... 21 <br /> IV.A.3 Emission Controls.................................................................................................................. 22 <br /> IV.B CO Emissions Are Significant.............................................................................................................. 22 <br /> IV.0 PM 10 Emissions Are Significant.......................................................................................................... 23 — <br /> IV.D The Draft EIR's Emission Estimates Are not Accurate................................................................. 24 <br /> IV.D.I Fugitive PM 10 Emissions from Unpaved Roads............................................................... 24 <br /> IV.D.2 Wind Erosion........................................................................................................................... 25 <br /> IV.D.3 Handling and Storage.............................................................................................................. 25 <br /> IV.D.4 Quarry Processing PM 10 Emissions................................................................................... 26 <br /> IV.D.S Pit Feeders................................................................................................................................ 27 — <br /> IV.D.6 Concrete Production and Recycling................................................................................... 27 <br /> i <br />