My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11. THE AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS IS FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED <br /> The Draft EIR states that the Project would have a significant air quality _ <br /> impact if it would: <br /> — Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality <br /> plan(s); <br /> — Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing <br /> or Project air quality violation; <br /> — Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant <br /> for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal — <br /> or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which <br /> exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors — i.e., 10 tons per B-e _ <br /> year of ROG or NOx); <br /> — Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, <br /> resulting in a cancer risk greater than 10 in one million or a hazard index <br /> greater than 1; <br /> — Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people; <br /> — Cause a net increase in pollutant emissions of ROG or NOx exceeding <br /> 10 tons per year; <br /> — Cause a violation of state CO concentration standards; or <br /> — Cause visible dust emissions due to onsite operations in violation of San _ <br /> Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District's Regulation VUL (Draft EIR, <br /> pp. 4.6-17/18.) <br /> There are two major problems with this set of significance criteria. First, the <br /> Draft EIR did not conduct any analyses to determine if some of the criteria were met. <br /> Second, the list of significance criteria is incomplete. These two problems are <br /> discussed below. <br /> IIA The Draft EIR Did not Conduct Any Analyses to Determine Compliance <br /> with some Significance Criteria <br /> The Draft EIR stated that the Project would be considered to have a <br /> significant air quality impact if it conflicts with or obstructs implementation of an air B-9 <br /> quality plan. (Draft EIR, p. 4.6-17.) The Draft EIR indicates that the Project would _ <br /> emit large amounts of pollutants, including those that have caused the San Joaquin <br /> Valley Air Basin to be classified as being in nonattainment — ROG, NOx, and PM10. <br /> (Draft EIR, Table 4.6-5A.) A number of plans have been developed to bring the San — <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.