Laserfiche WebLink
II.6.2 Short-Term Impacts Were not Evaluated <br /> The CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.2(a), require that"[djirect and indirect <br /> significant effects of the project on the environment shall be clearly identified and <br /> described, giving due consideration to both the short-term and long-term effects." <br /> (Emphasis added). The Draft EIR solely relied on the SJVAPCIYs annual — <br /> significance thresholds of 10 tons per year for NOx and ROG to determine the <br /> significance of all air quality impacts and completely ignored short-term impacts. <br /> (Draft EIR,Tables 4.6-4,4.6-5.) <br /> Ambient air quality standards, which must be protected,exist for shorter time <br /> periods — 1 hour, 8 hours and 24 hours. (Draft EIR, Table 4.6-1.) Intermittent <br /> activities, such as construction and mining, have very high short-term emissions that <br /> are averaged out when presented on an annual basis. These short-term peaks are _ <br /> missed entirely when only annual thresholds are used, as here. The SJVAPCD has <br /> not developed short-term, i.e. daily or hourly significance thresholds, like most other B-13 <br /> air districts. (GAMAQI,3 pp. 24-25.) — <br /> The use of the SJVAPCUs annual significance thresholds for short-term <br /> emissions is inequitable and not protective of the air quality in the air basin and does <br /> not constitute adequate review under CEQA. Recognizing this problem, the <br /> SJVAPCD is aiming to revise its quantitative significance thresholds and intends to <br /> add new significance thresholds for construction and cumulative impacts in the near <br /> future. (Meyer 01/064.) <br /> Given the lack of short-term quantitative significance thresholds in the <br /> SJVAPCIYs guidance, the County could have conducted ambient air quality <br /> dispersion modeling to evaluate whether ambient air quality standards would be — <br /> violated. (See Comment II.A.) In the alternative, the County could have used short- <br /> term significance thresholds developed by other air districts to screen for <br /> significance of criteria pollutant emissions. (See discussion in Comment II.B.2.) The <br /> Draft EIR should be revised to evaluate the significance of both short-term and <br /> annual emissions and the Draft EIR should be recirculated for review. <br /> 3 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District,Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality <br /> Impacts("GAMAQP'). <br /> 4 Petra Pless,phone conversation with Chrystal Meyer,San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control — <br /> District, (559)230-5835, on January 27,2006. <br /> 6 <br />