Laserfiche WebLink
D.2.9. Cultural Resources...................................................................................25 <br /> D.2.I O.Hazards and Hazardous Materials ...........................................................26 <br /> D.2.11.Visual Resources......................................................................................28 <br /> D.2.12.Cumulative Impacts.................................................................................29 <br /> D.3. Findings Regarding Impacts Analyzed in the EIR and Determined to be <br /> Significant and Unavoidable................................................................................ 31 <br /> D.3.1. Noise........................................................................................................ 32 <br /> D.3.2. Air Quality............................................................................................... 34 <br /> D.3.3. Cumulative Impacts.................................................................................36 <br /> D.4. Other CEQA Required Analysis in the EIR........................................................ 37 <br /> D.4.1. Cumulative Impact Analysis.................................................................... 37 <br /> D.4.2. Growth Inducing Impacts ........................................................................ 39 <br /> E. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT........................................................................... 39 <br /> E.1. Alternatives Considered but Rejected As Infeasible During the Scoping <br /> Process.................................................................................................................40 <br /> E.1.1. Alternative Processing Plant Location.....................................................40 <br /> E.1.2. Extraction of Aggregate Below the Groundwater Level .........................41 <br /> E.1.3. Processing Material Extracted At the Project <br /> Site At the Existing Cemex Tracy Facility..............................................43 <br /> E.2. Alternatives Evaluated in the EIR........................................................................43 <br /> E.3. Findings Regarding Alternatives Considered in the FIR.... ...............................44 <br /> E.3.1. No Project Alternative.............................................................................44 <br /> E.3.2. Reduced Project Production Alternative..................................................47 <br /> E.3.3. Offsite Alternative ................................................................................... 52 <br /> F. PROJECT BENEFITS..................................................................................................... 56 <br /> F.1. Mineral Resource Classification.......................................................................... 56 <br /> F.2. A Local Source Of Aggregate.............................................................................. 56 <br /> F.3 Maintain And Create Jobs.................................................................................... 57 <br /> F.4. Addition Of A Local Concrete And Asphalt Recycling Facility......................... 57 <br /> F.S. Contribute A Significant Portion Of The Funding <br /> For The Bird Road/SR 132 Interchange .............................................................. 57 <br /> F.6 Tax Revenue........................................................................................................ 57 <br /> G. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS.............................................. 57 <br /> ii <br />