SU0004094 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r r r F r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 2.5 Summary of Environmental Impacts TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Level of Significance (Level of Significance Prior to Mitigation) After Mitigation Land Use 4.2.1 The Proposed Project has the potential to conflict with 4.2.1 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.4.1a and b;4.4.2; Less than Significant existing and planned land uses surrounding the project 4.4.3;4.4.4;4.5.1 a,b,c and d;4.5.2;4.5.3;4.6.1;4.6.2; site.This would be a potentially significant impact.(PS) 4.6.4;and 4.12.2. 4.2.2 The project is consistent with applicable Land Use No mitigation is required. designations and policies.This would be a less-than- significant impact.(LS) 4.2.3 The Proposed Project could conflict with an applicable 4.2.3 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.9.2a—c. Less than Significant habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan.This would be a potentially significant impact.(PS) Agricultural Resources 4.3.1 Implementation of the Proposed Project would result in No mitigation is required. the disturbance of Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance.This would be a less-than- significant impact.(LS) 4.3.2 The Proposed Project would not conflict with the current No mitigation is required. agricultural zoning of the subject properties nor with the provisions of an existing Williamson Act contract.This would be a less-than-significant impact.(LS) 4.3.3 Mining activities have the potential to result in offsite 4.3.3 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.6.1 to control the Less than Significant impacts to adjacent agricultural lands.This would be a generation of fugitive dust during mining activities potentially significant impact.(PS) Vineyards in the project and haul route vicinity would potentially be adversely affected by fugitive dust from project operations.A literature review has found that spider mite population increases in vineyards could be associated with increased dust levels(Costello,2004; Lodi-Woodbridge Winegrape Commission,2002).Dust control measures incorporated at the project site and haul routes to reduce the total PM 10 to below the CAAOS would also reduce project related dust fallout on nearby vineyards. RMC Parc Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 2-5 ESA I Project No.203015 Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006