My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.Environmental Analysis <br /> The suitability of the local soil resource plays a crucial part in the determination of the — <br /> Department of Conservation's(DOC's)farmland classification.The land capability classification <br /> systema (LCC)developed by the USDA,Natural Resource Conservation Service(NRCS),rates <br /> each of the soil types within each respective county in relation to its associated limitations for — <br /> crop management. A soil rated as Class I would have few limitations whereas a soil rated as Class <br /> VIII could have severe limitations that,in most circumstances,would preclude it from <br /> commercial crop production. Figure 4.3-2 provides the LCC for soil resources covering the <br /> project site assuming a readily available supply of irrigation water. As depicted in Figure 4.3-2, <br /> the project site is primarily comprised of soil types with LCC ratings of I,II,and III,with soil <br /> depth(or depth to a root-restrictive layer)being the primary limitation to crop production. Based <br /> on these classifications, it may be concluded that the soil resource within the immediate project <br /> area presents few limitations to agricultural production. _ <br /> Regulatory Context <br /> Statewide Regulation <br /> California Land Conservation Act _ <br /> Under the provisions of the Williamson Act(California Land Conservation Act 1965, <br /> Section 51200), landowners contract with the County to maintain agricultural or open space use <br /> of their lands in return for reduced property tax assessment.The contract is self-renewing; — <br /> however,the landowner may notify the County at any time of the intent to withdraw the land <br /> from its preserve status.Withdrawal involves a ten-year period of tax adjustment to full market <br /> value before protected open space can be converted to urban uses.Consequently,land under a — <br /> Williamson Act Contract can be in either a renewal status or a non-renewal status.Lands with a <br /> non-renewal status indicate the owner has withdrawn from the Williamson Act Contract and is <br /> waiting for a period of tax adjustment for the land to reach its full market value. Non-renewal — <br /> lands are candidates for uses that were previously considered non-compatible within the next ten <br /> years or less,depending on when the notice of non-renewal was filed. <br /> In 1994,the Williamson Act was amended to include specific language regarding"conditional <br /> compatibility"(Government Code Section 51238.1), mining compatibility(Section 51238.2)and <br /> grandfather provisions(Section 51238.3). The requirements of Section 51238.1 and <br /> Section 5.1238.2 restrict the types of uses that may be allowed on Williamson Act lands for <br /> contracts entered after June 7, 1994.Here,the subject Williamson Act contract was entered in _ <br /> 1976(effective 1977);thus Sections 51238.1 and 51238.2 do not apply in this case. <br /> 3 Land Capability Classification–Capability grouping depicts,in general,the suitability of soils most kinds of field crops.The — <br /> groups are made according to the limitations of the soils when used for field crops.The capability system is grouped according to <br /> three(3)levels including,capability class,subclass,and unit.Capability Classes are designated by the Roman Numerals and are <br /> designed to indicate a progressively greater limitation and/or narrower practical use according to a corresponding increase from I to <br /> VIII.Capability Subclasses are designated by the small letter and give an indication of the main limitation associated with the soil _ <br /> type(i.e.,e-erosion,w-wetness,s-shallow,c-climate).Capability units are soil groups within subclasses and suggest the chief <br /> kind of limitation.Generally Capability Class 3 or less is considered Prime Farmland according to the California Department of <br /> Conservation. <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project ESA/203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.