Laserfiche WebLink
4.Environmental Analysis <br /> him <br /> including information on geology,groundwater levels and trends, soil conditions,groundwater <br /> recharge and aquifer properties. The MWA study included a regional groundwater well inventory <br /> that identified a total of 17 groundwater wells within the vicinity of the proposed site including <br /> nine domestic wells, seven irrigation wells, and one industrial well. MWA used an accepted <br /> ` mathematical approach in conjunction with known aquifer properties in the Vernalis area to <br /> evaluate this potential impact. It is important to note that MWA did not conduct actual well pump <br /> tests to determine the physical response of the wells to groundwater pumping. Specifically, MWA <br /> used equations developed by C. V. Theis, known as the Theis Equations,13 to estimate the <br /> potential drawdown in vicinity wells, based on certain pumping rates. The Theis Equations <br /> r. incorporate many assumptions regarding well depth,aquifer extent, and groundwater extraction <br /> rates.14 For its analysis,MWA also applied data from the Central Valley Groundwater <br /> Simulation Model(CVGSM) to obtain a hydraulic conductivity of about 20 feet per day, aquifer <br /> thickness ranging from 600 to 800 feet,and transmissivity of 100,000 gallons per day per foot. <br /> The MWA study analyzed groundwater withdrawal rates of 60 gallons per minute(gpm), <br /> 100 gpm, 500 gpm,and 1,000 gpm from multiple wells assuming 240 days of continuous <br /> pumping with no local recharge from deep percolation or stream percolation during this period. <br /> The MWA results indicated that up to 6 feet of drawdown could occur in groundwater wells <br /> located 500 feet from the discharge well extracting 1,000 gallons per minute. The calculated <br /> drawdown values represent the long-term drawdown in both the confined and unconfined aquifer <br /> and it was anticipated that the drawdown in the two aquifer systems would be similar.However, <br /> these estimates do not include the effect of other nearby pumping wells or regional drawdown. <br /> Alternative Groundwater Pumping Scenario <br /> San Joaquin County,Water Resources Division requested that this EIR consider and evaluate the <br /> feasibility of pumping the shallow, unconfined groundwater for wash water supply at the <br /> ►. proposed milting operation rather than pumping groundwater from the deeper,confined aquifer. . <br /> Under this scenario, two new onsite wells would be constructed in the shallow, unconfined zone. <br /> Based on the depths of existing groundwater supply wells and the current understanding of local <br /> hydrogeologic conditions, wells in the unconfined zone would tap groundwater at depths between <br /> 100 feet and 200 feet. The conclusions of the following preliminary assessment are based on the <br /> benefits described by San Joaquin County in its memorandum dated May 20, 2004: <br /> • Although groundwater extraction from the unconfined zones could reduce demand on <br /> the higher quality groundwater in the confined zone,it is likely that the demand <br /> .. reduction would be insignificant, given the size and potential yield of the vast, <br /> confined groundwater aquifer system. <br /> • Using the unconfined zone would certainly reduce the amount of higher-quality <br /> ` groundwater needed for product wash water; however,the use of the lower quality <br /> shallow groundwater could present operation disruptions due to the effects of high <br /> hardness and TDS on metal equipment. <br /> r <br /> 13 The Theis Equations are widely used in the study of groundwater flow.These equations analyze radial flow to wells <br /> in confined aquifers. <br /> 14 Although this mathematical approach has been applied with relative accuracy in many groundwater evaluations,the <br /> use of this approach can not substitute data obtained through site-specific well yield and aquifer testing. <br /> r. RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 4.8-28 ESA/203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />