Laserfiche WebLink
4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> Impact 4.8.6: Mining out Hospital Creek and constructing a berm to form a large <br /> detention basin (Mining Plan Option 2) would substantially alter the natural hydrology of <br /> Hospital Creek.This option would permanently remove surface water flows from the <br /> reach of Hospital Creek downstream of the proposed mining operations leading to — <br /> depletion of flows to downstream receiving water bodies, reduction of surface water <br /> available for localized infiltration,or elimination of adequate water flow for aquatic and <br /> riparian habitats. This would be a significant impact. <br /> The proposed project design includes two options for mining near Hospital Creek. The first <br /> option would leave Hospital Creek in place and mine both sides of the creek. A 100-foot setback <br /> placed between Hospital Creek and the active mining area would serve to protect the creek and <br /> allow the creek to flow in its existing channel.The second option would construct a berm to <br /> separate mine Phases IH and V and Phases VI and VII to form a large surface water detention <br /> basin. Once constructed, the reach of Hospital Creek that traverses the proposed mining area <br /> would then be mined out,thus removing the existing alignment of the creek and the materials <br /> underlying it. The project applicant would construct an inlet flow dissipation structure at the — <br /> location that Hospital Creek currently enters the site and would construct a spillway at the <br /> location that the creek exits. <br /> Under the first mining option, Hospital Creek would remain an active stream channel with no <br /> alteration in existing flows downstream. However,because mining would take place on either <br /> side of the channel reach that traverses the active mine area, runoff from the project site would no — <br /> longer contribute to flows in the creek. The reduction in flow caused by eliminating the site <br /> contribution to Hospital Creek is not a significant loss due to the small volume of annual rainfall, <br /> the small contributing area of the project site, and the location of the project site in the lower — <br /> portion of the watershed. <br /> The second mining option would redirect all flows of Hospital Creek into the active mining area. <br /> Flows will enter the project site after crossing the conveyance structure over the Delta-Mendota <br /> Canal and there would be no flow in the creek downstream of the project site. As part of this <br /> option, a constructed retention pond would be used to manage flood flows. No off-site discharge <br /> is planned in this proposed design unless, in the very rare case,the detention pond overflows to <br /> discharge water downstream. However, considering the size of the detention basin,it is unlikely <br /> that Hospital Creek, in combination with a large storm event,could generate a volume of runoff — <br /> capable of exceeding the detention basin volume. In most cases, the detained flows would <br /> infiltrate through the bottom of the pond. — <br /> According to the significance criteria, the second mining option results in significant impacts <br /> because it depletes flows to downstream receiving water bodies and reduces surface water — <br /> available for localized infiltration. Discussion of these potential impacts is presented below. <br /> Hospital Creek,Lone Tree Creek, and Ingram Creek combine downstream of the project site and <br /> enter the San Joaquin River near Vemalis. The flow contribution provided by Hospital Creek <br /> represents approximately 50 percent of the total flows provided to the San Joaquin River by these <br /> three creeks. Hospital Creek is the largest nearby stream that conveys drainage from the central — <br /> Coast Range. Surface water generated from the 32-square-mile watershed drained by Hospital <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 4.8-31 ESA/203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />