My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> Impact 4.8.6: Mining out Hospital Creek and constructing a berm to form a large <br /> detention basin (Mining Plan Option 2) would substantially alter the natural hydrology of <br /> Hospital Creek.This option would permanently remove surface water flows from the <br /> reach of Hospital Creek downstream of the proposed mining operations leading to — <br /> depletion of flows to downstream receiving water bodies, reduction of surface water <br /> available for localized infiltration,or elimination of adequate water flow for aquatic and <br /> riparian habitats. This would be a significant impact. <br /> The proposed project design includes two options for mining near Hospital Creek. The first <br /> option would leave Hospital Creek in place and mine both sides of the creek. A 100-foot setback <br /> placed between Hospital Creek and the active mining area would serve to protect the creek and <br /> allow the creek to flow in its existing channel.The second option would construct a berm to <br /> separate mine Phases IH and V and Phases VI and VII to form a large surface water detention <br /> basin. Once constructed, the reach of Hospital Creek that traverses the proposed mining area <br /> would then be mined out,thus removing the existing alignment of the creek and the materials <br /> underlying it. The project applicant would construct an inlet flow dissipation structure at the — <br /> location that Hospital Creek currently enters the site and would construct a spillway at the <br /> location that the creek exits. <br /> Under the first mining option, Hospital Creek would remain an active stream channel with no <br /> alteration in existing flows downstream. However,because mining would take place on either <br /> side of the channel reach that traverses the active mine area, runoff from the project site would no — <br /> longer contribute to flows in the creek. The reduction in flow caused by eliminating the site <br /> contribution to Hospital Creek is not a significant loss due to the small volume of annual rainfall, <br /> the small contributing area of the project site, and the location of the project site in the lower — <br /> portion of the watershed. <br /> The second mining option would redirect all flows of Hospital Creek into the active mining area. <br /> Flows will enter the project site after crossing the conveyance structure over the Delta-Mendota <br /> Canal and there would be no flow in the creek downstream of the project site. As part of this <br /> option, a constructed retention pond would be used to manage flood flows. No off-site discharge <br /> is planned in this proposed design unless, in the very rare case,the detention pond overflows to <br /> discharge water downstream. However, considering the size of the detention basin,it is unlikely <br /> that Hospital Creek, in combination with a large storm event,could generate a volume of runoff — <br /> capable of exceeding the detention basin volume. In most cases, the detained flows would <br /> infiltrate through the bottom of the pond. — <br /> According to the significance criteria, the second mining option results in significant impacts <br /> because it depletes flows to downstream receiving water bodies and reduces surface water — <br /> available for localized infiltration. Discussion of these potential impacts is presented below. <br /> Hospital Creek,Lone Tree Creek, and Ingram Creek combine downstream of the project site and <br /> enter the San Joaquin River near Vemalis. The flow contribution provided by Hospital Creek <br /> represents approximately 50 percent of the total flows provided to the San Joaquin River by these <br /> three creeks. Hospital Creek is the largest nearby stream that conveys drainage from the central — <br /> Coast Range. Surface water generated from the 32-square-mile watershed drained by Hospital <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 4.8-31 ESA/203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.