Laserfiche WebLink
4.Environmental Analysis — <br /> Known Cultural Resources <br /> Methods <br /> The effort to identify cultural resources in the project area included a record search,contacts with <br /> Native Americans, and a field survey. <br /> A cultural resources records search of all pertinent survey and site data was conducted at the — <br /> Central California Information Center on August 13, 2003. The records were accessed by <br /> utilizing the Vernalis and Solyo USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps and included the proposed <br /> project area along with a one-quarter-mile radius around the project site. In addition to <br /> Information Center maps and site record forms,other sources that were reviewed included the <br /> Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data Files for San Joaquin and Stanislaus — <br /> Counties,the National Register of Historic Places,the California Register of Historic Resources, <br /> the California Inventory of Historic Resources(1976),the California Historical Landmarks <br /> (1996), and the California Points of Historical Interest(1992). The records search indicated that _ <br /> no cultural resources have previously been identified in or adjacent to the proposed project area. <br /> The records search also indicated that the proposed project area has not previously been subjected <br /> to archaeological inspection. — <br /> The Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC) was contacted by an ESA archaeologist on <br /> December 4, 2003,and requested to provide information on locations of importance to Native — <br /> Americans and a list of Native Americans who should be contacted. The NAHC provided a list of <br /> three Native American organizations that should be contacted conceming locations of importance <br /> to Native Americans in the project area. ESA sent a letter to each organization on the NAHC list, <br /> providing information about the proposed project and requesting information on locations of <br /> importance to Native Americans (Appendix F). No responses have been received to date. <br /> An archaeological field inspection of the project area was conducted between October 7 and 14, <br /> 2003,by two ESA Registered Professional Archaeologists.The surface of the entire project area <br /> was inspected using systematic survey transects spaced between 20 and 60 meters apart. Surface <br /> visibility was excellent in most of the proposed project area because natural vegetation had been <br /> cleared for agricultural purposes(crops and orchards). <br /> Results <br /> No cultural resources were identified in the project area as a result of previous investigations or <br /> the field survey conducted for the proposed project. No evidence of prehistoric or historic <br /> archaeological remains was identified in the proposed project area, and no historic buildings or <br /> structures are present. Buildings and structures are less than 50 years old and are not considered <br /> to be historical resources. Although no archaeological remains were identified and the entire <br /> proposed project area has been subjected to prior disturbance associated with agricultural uses, it <br /> is possible that unidentified, buried archaeological remains are present. <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 4.10-4 ESA 1203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />