Laserfiche WebLink
It should be noted that, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the San Joaquin <br /> County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors may balance the benefits of I <br /> adoption of the project against the unavoidable environmental impacts in determining ' <br /> whether to approve the project. If.the benefits are found to outweigh the impacts, the ! <br /> adverse effects may be considered "acceptable" and an or all of the identified <br /> Y mitigation � <br /> measures may be rejected. <br /> Context for Cumulative Impact Analysis <br /> Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines requires a discussion off potential cumulative <br /> impacts that could result from a proposed project in conjunction with other projects in the <br /> vicinity. Cumulative impacts occur when two or more individual effects together create a <br /> considerable environmental impact or compound or increase other impacts. An EIR must <br /> contain a discussion of cumulative impacts, meaning the impacts of the project viewed in <br /> the context of environmental impacts expected to be caused by reasonably foreseeable i! <br /> or possible future projects. The possible future projects considered generally consist of a <br /> list of specific projects that have been approved, are under consideration for approval, or <br /> are contemplated in adopted general plans. I, <br /> The proposed project is within an area containing significant aggregate deposits and other <br /> quarry excavations (Figure 4-1). This area provides the context for the cumulative impacts <br /> analysis for this EIR and includes the following related projects: " <br /> 3 <br /> �j <br /> 1. A Use Permit was recently granted to Granite Construction Company in Stanislaus <br /> i. County for an approximately 320-acre site that is tentatively scheduled to begin f <br /> mining in 1998. This site is located southeast of the proposed project site. <br /> 2. Brown Sand is currently processing a permit to expand their existing aggregate <br /> operations to include a 380-acre site, of which 337 acres will be excavated to a <br /> maximum depth of 150 feet below ground level. Total production over the 50-year it <br /> life of the project would be approximately 65 million tons of sand and gravel. The <br /> Brown.Sand project is located south of Blewett Road and :west of Interstate 5, <br /> F11 approximately 1.5 miles west of the project site. An EIR was recently prepared for I' <br /> the Brown Sand expansion (ER-96-2, SCH #96042075). <br /> 3. Teichert Aggregates, located directly west of the project site, recently received it <br /> approval for its quarry excavation of approximately 820 acres (QX-91-5, ER-92-2, Ij i <br /> SCH #91052007). Approximately 736 acres would be mined over a 50-year period !i <br /> F; <br /> and yield approximately 101 million tons of sand and gravel.,. i <br /> 4. A potential mining site currently under contract to Lone Star, containing 530 acres, <br /> r <br /> is located east of the project site. �! <br /> Cumulative impacts would occur in the following environmental areas: Agriculture and <br /> Land Use, Traffic and Circulation; Air Quality; Noise; Biological Resources, and Cultural jl <br /> Resources. Cumulative impacts within these areas are discussed at the end of each of the <br /> j corresponding issue sections in this chapter. <br /> � I <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 4-3 ER-96-3 <br /> ii <br />