Laserfiche WebLink
the borings ranged from approximately 90 to 137 feet NGVD. A silty clay layer at the <br /> surface extended to depths of two to 12 feet bgs. The remainder of the subsurface profile <br /> is dominated by dense, red brown clayey and silty gravels. Relatively thin lenses of silty <br /> clay and silty or clayey sands were encountered in each of the borings. The thickest layers I! <br /> k (6 to 12.5 feet thick) of silty clay were encountered in borings A-2, B-1, and B-3. Boring <br /> B-4 encountered numerous thin layers of sand, silt; and clay '(refer directly to the <br /> Kleinfelder report for additional information on the sampling results). it <br /> Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings, including the borings located near <br /> the project site boundaries closest to the Delta Mendota Canal (Cl through C4) and <br /> California Aqueduct (A-1) which indicates that perched groundwater conditions were not <br /> present (Such conditions could be an indication of significant seepage from these water <br /> conveyance structures.) <br /> Local Soils <br /> Soil, as described in this section, is the natural formation of mineral and organic material !, <br /> Soils can develop on unconsolidated sediments and weathered bedrock. The development <br /> of a soil is typically dependent on five major influences: climate,. topography, biologic <br /> activity, parent material, and time. Differences .in soil types are, therefore, caused by <br /> changes in these influences.-At the project site and within the site vicinity, different soils <br /> have been identified by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service.(USDA,:1992) on the basis of .I <br /> characteristics that reflect relatively subtle but important changes in the soil formation ! <br /> factors. In general, the topography is relatively 7flat, the climate is similar, and biological <br /> activity is comparable. <br /> Two soil mapping units have been identified at the project site (USDA, 1992). The majority FI <br /> ,. of the site is mapped as Zacharias gravelly clay loam. The northern portion of the project <br />' - site contains Zacharias clay loam. The major difference in the two soil types is that the !I <br /> . surface soil (uppermost horizons) for the clay loam is thicker and more fine-grained. it <br /> The Zacharias soils are deep, well-drained soil that is developed on nearly level surfaces <br /> underlain by alluvial sediment deposits. Runoff is moderately slow on these surfaces and <br /> the erosion hazard is slight. The permeability is moderately slow and the available water �I <br /> capacity is high. The shrink-swell potential is moderate. The organic content is relatively <br /> low, one to two percent. <br /> The Zacharias soils are well-suited for agriculture, particularly when irrigated. Agriculture <br /> on these soils throughout the region includes irrigated row, field, and orchard crops and I' <br /> some dryland grain crop production. When irrigated,-the gravelly clay loam has moderate <br /> limitations to its use for agriculture due to its gravelly texture (Capability Class FIs-4). The <br /> clay loam has few limitations for agricultural use (Capability Class 1)when irrigated. Both <br /> of these soil mapping units, where irrigated, are considered "Prime f=armland" by the U.S. <br /> Soil Conservation Service and the California Department of Conservation. (For additional �! <br /> discussion of farmland impacts, refer to Section 4.3.) <br /> i <br /> E Draft Environmental Impact Report 4-11 ER-96-3 <br /> l <br />