Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> All Quan Excavation Alternatives 1 2 and-31 <br /> Impact 4.2-2 <br /> Slope Stability <br /> The natural gentle (approximate one percent gradient) slope of the alluvial fan at the <br /> project site is stable and has a low potential for erosion. However, the project proposes <br /> creation of deep mining pits to elevation 85 feet NGVD and 120 feet bgs. During mining, <br /> temporary cut slopes would be excavated at a steepness of one third of a foot horizontal <br /> to one foot vertical (113:1). Fifteen-foot wide benches would be placed every 30 feet of cut <br /> slope height. The average slope of the benched excavation would be 314:1. The <br /> excavated slopes would be reclaimed by placing fill to create final fill reclaimed slopes. The <br /> reclaimed slopes would be graded to a steepness of 1.5:1 with 20-foot benches placed <br /> every 50 feet of slope height. The fill would consist of processing fines collected in ponds. <br /> The proposed reclamation plan estimates that approximately 90 percent of the processing s <br /> fines would be silt and clay. These fine-grained sediments would be compacted by <br /> earthmoving equipment, used to place the fill. <br /> Two slope stability analyses were performed for the pro posed project slopes to evaluate <br /> the potential for slope failure during mining and following reclamation. A preliminary slope <br /> stability analysis prepared by Foothill Engineering was submitted to the County with the <br /> proposed project application. This analysis evaluated the 1.5:1 reclamation slopes. The <br /> computed factor of safety for the slope was 2.1. The factor of safety generated by a slope <br /> stability analysis represents the ratio of factors which drive slope failure to the factors which <br /> resist slope failure. When the computed factor of safety is less than one, the slope is <br /> considered to be at or near failure. <br /> A second slope stability analysis was prepared for the proposed project (Kleinfelder, 1997).- <br /> This <br /> 997).This analysis evaluated the stability of the excavation and reclaimed slopes under static <br /> and pseudo-static (seismic shaking) conditions. A variety of types of slope failure were , <br /> evaluated including shallow failure of slope between benched and deep-seated failure of <br /> the composite (entire) slope. Due to the difficulty in obtaining undisturbed samples of the <br /> dense sand and gravel sediments, values of the angle of internal friction, cohesion and unit E J <br /> weight of the sediments at the project site (parameters used in the slope stability <br /> evaluation) were estimated on the basis of data collected from other mining projects within <br /> the vicinity of the project site. The seismic coefficient (expected seismic shaking) for the <br /> stability analysis was 0.15g. This value was chosen on the basis of professional <br /> judgement regarding the proximity of the project site to active faults and estimation of ' <br /> sustained seismic shaking. The CRSBBZ was not specifically considered as a seismic <br /> source by Kleinfelder. The seismic coefficient was determined to be approximately two- <br /> thirds of the expected peak acceleration (Heinzen, 1997). <br /> The results of the analysis indicated that the factor of safety for shallow slides on the <br /> excavation slopes ranged from 1.3 to 2.2 under static conditions and 1.1 to 1.8 under <br /> pseudo-static conditions. A deep-seated slide on the excavation slope had factor of safety <br /> values of 1.3 for static conditions and 1.0 to 1.1 for pseudo-static conditions. <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 4-16 ER-96-3 <br />