Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> In addition, the CAA requires that projects receiving federal funds demonstrate conformity <br /> with the approved SIP and local air quality attainment plan for the region. Since California <br /> standards are more strict than federal standards, conformity with the California <br /> requirements are expected to satisfy the requirements of the CAA and subsequent <br /> amendments. <br /> California Clean Air Act <br /> The California Air Resources Board (CARE) is the agency responsible for coordination and <br /> oversight of state and local air pollution control programs in California and for implementing <br /> the requirements of the California Clean Air Act of 1988 (CCAA). <br /> The CCAA requires that all air districts in the state endeavor to achieve and maintain <br /> California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), <br /> sulfur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) by the earliest practical date. Plans for <br /> attaining CAAQS were to be submitted to CARB by June 30, 1999. The CCAA specifies <br /> that districts focus particular attention on reducing the emissions from transportation and <br /> area-wide emission sources, and the Act provides districts with new authority to regulate <br /> indirect sources. Each district pian is to achieve a 5% annual reduction, averaged over <br /> consecutive 3-year periods, in district-wide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or <br /> its precursors and provide for "no net" increase in regional emissions. Any additional <br /> development,within the region would impede the "no net" increase prohibition, in that <br /> further emissions reductions must be effected from other airshed sources to accommodate <br /> any project development mobile source emissions increase. <br /> A strict interpretation of the "no net" increase prohibition suggests that any general <br />' development within the region, no matter how large or small, would have a significant, <br /> project-specific air quality impact unless the development-related emissions are offset by <br /> concurrent emissions reduction elsewhere within the airshed. Any planning effort for air <br /> quality attainment would thus need to consider both state and federal planning <br /> requirements. <br /> San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air Quality Attainment Plan <br /> The SJVUAPCD is the agency with jurisdiction over air quality regulation in the Basin. In <br /> an effort to reach attainment of the state standards for 03, the SJVUAPCD has prepared <br /> and published its 1991 Air Quality Attainment Plan (AQAP). In addition to commitments <br /> to implement all feasible control measures, the governing board in adopting the 1991 <br /> AQAP on January 30, 1992 also committed to other requirements of the CCAA for severe <br /> non-attainment areas, including: (1) implementation of a permit program designed to <br /> achieve no net increase in emissions of nonattainment pollutants; (2) implementation of <br /> best available retrofit control technology (BARCT) measures for existing stationary <br /> sources; (3) implementation of best available control technology (BACT) for new or <br /> modified sources; and (4) implementation of transportation control measures. Conformity <br /> with the AQAP is demonstrated through compliance with applicable Rules and Regulations <br /> adopted to achieve the goals of the AQAP (SJVUAPCD, 1992). <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 4-62 ER-96-3 <br />