My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004149
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36869
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-96-0001
>
SU0004149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:00:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:44:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004149
FACILITY_NAME
QX-96-0001
STREET_NUMBER
36869
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36869 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
9/22/1996 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36869\QX-96-01_EIR 96-3\SU0004149\PUB REC REL APPL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
782
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> it{ E Total Operational Emissions <br /> ,1 P <br /> Total estimated operational emissions are presented in Table 4.6-8 for Alternatives 1, 2, <br /> and:3. As indicated, operational emissions would result in approximately 63 lbs/day of <br /> ROG, 391 lbs/day of NO,, 392 lbs/day of CO, 1,928 lbs/day of PM10, and 15 Ibslday of SOX. <br /> The collective impacts, while greater in magnitude than the individual project activities, i <br /> i would result in total regional operational emissions of ROG, NOX, and PM,, in excess of the l <br /> SJVUAPCD thresholds. This would be considered a significant impact of Alternatives 1, <br /> 2, and 3. <br /> Table 4.5-8: Projected Total Regional Operational Emissions (Alternatives 1, 2,and 3) <br /> POLLUTANT(lbs/day) <br /> COMPONENT <br /> ROG NO CO PM,. SO, <br /> � I' <br />' s Fugitive Dust Emissions 1 -- — -- 1,541.7 — <br /> Mobile Sources 46.7 261.7 201.1 49.5 -- <br /> C <br /> Plant Emissions 16.2 929.1 190.8 336.8 15.1 <br /> Total Daily Emissions 62.8 390.8 391.9 1,927.8 15.1 <br /> SJVUAPCD Thresholds z. '55 55 550 80 150 <br /> Based on implementation of proposed fugitive dust mitigation measures, assumes a 50%control <br /> efficiency rate. <br /> s -Based on SJVUAPCD New Source Review Significance Thresholds. 'l <br /> Source: EDAW 1997. <br /> r' Alternative 4: No Project F <br /> Because no mining, reclamation, or processing plant activities would occur with Alternative <br /> 4, this alternative would not generate operational emissions. Therefore, no adverse impact <br /> ii <br /> associated with regional operational emissions would result from this alternative. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.5-2a (Alternatives 9, 2, and 3) <br /> The proponent shall implement the following mitigation measures for the control of k <br /> 4 fugitive dust (PMia) emissions during the operational phase of the project in <br /> accordance with the requirements and recommendations of the SJVUAPCD: <br /> I • Implement the control mechanisms proposed in Mitigation Measures 4.5-9a <br /> i <br /> Chutes and conveyers transporting materials for a distance of twelve feet or <br /> greater shall limit visible dust emissions by utilization of spray equipment, or <br />' materials conveyed shall be washed, separated, or screened to remove <br /> PM,a. <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 4-77. . ER-96-3 <br />[ 'k <br /> f �M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.