Laserfiche WebLink
ff F <br /> i <br /> California State Mining and Geology Board Regulations <br /> Section 3503 of the State Reclamation Regulations states that all reasonable measures <br /> shall be taken to protect fish and wildlife habitat. Section 3703 provides performance <br /> standards for wildlife habitat and specifies that protection of special-status species shall <br /> occur in accordance with the applicable regulatory agencies and their adopted standards. <br /> Section 3703 performance standards also require that wildlife habitat be established on <br /> disturbed land to at least pre-mining conditions, unless the reclamation plan provides for <br /> another use of the reclaimed site. <br /> IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> Standards of Significance <br /> APP endix G of the State CEQA Guidelines states that a project will normally have a <br /> significant impact on biological resources if it will: <br /> Substantially affect a rare or endangered species of plant or animal or the habitat <br /> g p <br /> of such species; <br /> • interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife <br /> species; or ; <br /> • substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife, or plants. <br /> Section 15065(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines also states that a project may have a <br /> significant effect on the environment when "the project has the potential to substantially <br /> degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife <br /> species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten <br /> to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a <br /> rare or endangered plant or animal." Other significant impacts could include those that <br /> would conflict with local, state, or federal resource conservation plans, goals, or <br /> regulations. <br /> Impact 4.7-1 <br /> Potential Impacts to Common Plants and Wildlife <br /> All Quar[y Excavation Alternatives (1, 2, and_3) <br /> Mining on the project site under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 would disturb a total of 142 acres <br /> of open/agricultural land over a 56 year period. The proposed mining and excavation <br /> activities would effectively remove all existing vegetation and reduce the local populations <br /> of some common plant and wildlife species that occur on the project site. Some common <br /> wildlife species could also be affected by increased truck traffic on adjacent roadways <br /> which could lead to an increase in mortality resulting from collisions with vehicles. Most <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 4-101 ER-96-3 <br />