Laserfiche WebLink
V <br /> %` rc• v ,gp <br /> CHAPTER5:0 CEQA CONSIDERA � <br /> TIONS <br /> �,t.�?.x. rf.air rig��S� tu, c��.t�'� -",s3 ,,� 3H �'.,�� �•� EEzts�tu',. . s N r�a{^sk� g 6 e `, <br /> @r ' <br /> 5.1 GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS <br /> In order to comply with CEQA, a Draft EIR must discuss the ways in which the proposed <br /> project could foster economic or populationrowth or the construction strut#ion of housing, either <br /> directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment [CEQA Guidelines §15126(g)]. A <br /> given project could induce growth within a community by lowering or removing barriers to <br /> growth, such as providing water service to an area where none currently exists, or by <br /> creating an amenity that attracts new population or economic activity. The growth-inducing <br /> potential of a project would be considered to have a significant impact if the project either <br /> induced growth or created the capacity for growth above and beyond the levels permitted <br /> by existing public planning policies or recommended by independent projections. A <br /> �- ro growth-inducing project's j 9 g potential does not, however, automatically result its growth, <br /> whether it be a portion of projected growth, or an actual exceedance of the projected <br /> growth levels. Growth at the local level is fundamentally controlled by the land use policies <br /> of local municipalities or counties, which.are determined by the local policies in each <br /> jurisdiction. Growth-inducing potential or pressure, created by economic or social <br /> conditions, is transformed into actual growth only by decision makers. <br /> Growth inducement may be considered detrimental, beneficial, or of insignificant <br /> consequence under CEQA. Induced growth is considered a significant impact only if it <br /> directly or indirectly affects the ability'of agencies to provide needed public services, or if <br /> it can be demonstrated that the potential growth, in some other way, significantly affects <br /> r the environment. <br /> Impact 5.2-1: Encouragement of Economic Growth <br /> Implementation of the project alternatives would not encourage economic mit growth, but . <br /> would provide for further development of the region. Sand and gravel are "construction ' <br /> f materials." These commodities, collectively referred to as aggregate, provide bulk and <br /> strength to Portland cement concrete, asphaltic concrete, and plaster, or stucco. € <br /> Aggregate is also used as a roadbase, subbase, railroad ballast, or fill. Aggregate normally <br /> provides from 80 to 100 percent of the material volume in the above uses. Aggregate <br /> material is essential to the needs of a modern society, and is a resource of great <br /> importance to the County's economic well-being. Under the project alternatives, <br /> approximately 531,250 tons of material per year would be mined from the project site for ` <br /> i <br /> use in the development of roadways, canals, parking lots, sidewalks, bridge abutments, <br /> foundations, buildings; public works projects, and general construction: <br /> Implementation of the project alternatives would provide for a continued availability of <br /> moderately-priced aggregates in the San Joaquin County region in the near future, at <br /> i <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 5-1 ER-96-3 <br /> t ` <br />