Laserfiche WebLink
GROUNDWATER INFORMATION <br /> The Map, Lines of Equal Depth to Groundwater, Spring 1999 shows approximately 105'to static <br /> �- water. Jahant Slough drains did drain the area but much of the smaller channels to the Slough <br /> have been filled in. The pond on the southerly portion was probably part of the surface drainage at <br /> one time. The surface runoff flows westerly. <br /> y The well ted by FarW s r DBCP and Nitrates. The results were: <br /> Nitrates- .5 m and DBC -<0.01 u The water is potable with respect to these two tests. <br /> There is no c of title as there is no third party involved in the sampling and testing of the well. <br /> The lab furnishes a log sheet which is included in this report. <br /> ` SOIL PROFILE INFORMATION <br /> PThe soil removed from the holes is classified at the time of removal and also the difficulty in <br /> r, drilling the holes helps define the soil. The soil observed at the site is classed as silt loam. It is <br /> mostly clay with silt and interspersed layers of sand. The field profile is noted as follows: <br /> s <br /> L K1=5.5 feet Sandy Clay, moist <br /> L16-8.5 feet Hard drilling, clay <br /> "5-11.5 feet Sand <br /> 11.5-25 Clay, with hard pan layers and interspersed with sandy silty clay layer near 25'. <br /> Pits are required to provide access to the sand layer. <br /> PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION <br /> /The location of the test hole is plotted on the T.M. A 42" hole and a 25'hole were drilled and <br /> after examination of the soil a hole to the sand layer was augured for testing. All holes conformed <br /> ` to EHD Policy 02-02. <br /> The percolation test date was 5-12-06. The holes were pre-soaked for 24 hours, starting at 0900 <br /> on 5-11-06. All holes were sleeved(see Smith& Associates hole prep sheet)with PVC and 2" of <br /> gravel was placed in the bottom of each hole prior to sleeving. All holes were dry at 0900, 5-12- <br /> 06. <br /> km The test form has been signed by the EHD representative who was present for the last two <br /> readings. <br /> Acre does not appear to be any need for an engineered system to be considered. An on site <br /> system is performing satisfactorily at present on the subject parcel. If a second dwelling is <br /> constructed in the future the test location is indicative of a probable satisfactory strata being <br /> present to support the SFR. <br /> 2. <br />