Laserfiche WebLink
L v ..01 <br /> LFebruary 16,2005 <br /> NOA Project Number: E040149A <br /> LTable 5. <br /> Soil Boring Log for P-2. <br /> Depth Interval (ft) Soil Type Unified Soil Classification <br /> 0-1.5 Dark brown,moist,clayey silt ML <br /> 1.5 -3 Brown,moist, silty sand SM <br /> Note: Conditions were comparable in all holes,shallow and deep. <br /> 6- Table 6. <br /> Soil Boring Log for P-3. <br /> L Depth Interval (ft) Soil Type Unified Soil Classification <br /> 0-1.75 Dark brown,moist clayey silt ML <br /> L1.75-3 Brown, moist, sandy silt with some clay SM <br /> LNote:Conditions were comparable in all holes,shallow and deep. <br /> L, Table 7. <br /> Soil Boring Log for P-4. <br /> Depth Interval (ft) Soil Type Unified Soil Classification <br /> 0-1.5 Dark brown,moist, clayey silt ML <br /> 1.5-2 Dark brown,moist, sandy silt with clay SM <br /> 2-3 Brown, moist, sand SP <br /> LNote:Conditions were comparable in all holes,shallow and deep. <br /> L5.4 Discussion of Soil Lithology <br /> A visual inspection of the shallow and deep soils from on-site drilling indicates some potential for <br /> satisfactory percolation. A percolation test is the best method to determine the suitability of the <br /> Lsoils. Please see the next section for percolation test results. Generally speaking, sandy soils have <br /> much greater potential for percolation than fine-grained soils. <br /> L <br /> L <br /> L <br /> L ' '004 <br /> L <br />