Laserfiche WebLink
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Z` ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, 3rd Floor, Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br /> C o <br /> Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> q5/do RN.' <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> Fs <br /> ITE LOCATION: 2 TJ 7y 11 / A / PA#: <br /> L O✓1� A �C !✓7C4�flJv�- REPORT DATE: /_-;-? E; <br /> S = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905,Section 9-905.12 <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of site (regrxt mustaddress all parcel ) Igding current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> F-11.2 Description of proposed developme t. . <br /> Ly ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. 2- �v—L„- ) <br /> [� ❑ 1.4 Site map showing to f o of all items on parcel. (Examples:structure rives,wells, septic systems, large trees, <br /> pastures, pools, natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways, etc.) A,j"z.4jd ' <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past, present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information: currentInd/or previous property owners, historical maps, insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications, etc.) 2-e- 31 A -I C _) <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> [� ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search, EHD r ords s�ch, a ncultur�l <br /> chemical application search, site reconnaissance and survey, eta f J"-yOr �S�Cry , 7 <br /> [� ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and low ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/storage/use, aboveground/underground tanks, <br /> septic systems, injection wells, unsealed wells, ponds/lagoons,vehicle/machine repair/painting, buried or <br /> �// stockpiled solid waste, etc.) � tc' <br /> E ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site It ten'fial and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site (see examples above y fy I u <br /> 131/ F-13.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or kno n above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close p oximit)to a former <br /> �/ landfill/former gasoline station, in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact, etc.) (`6 l/ <br /> LJ ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground source of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED <br /> / AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> E ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified (in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and t"env`onment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. ("y. 4 ) <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ <br /> 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a a or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e. collection of soil/water samples) and/or mitigative measures (i.e., clean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> EK ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive(i.e. all information referenced was included in this report-report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> ❑ 5.3 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> �" ' ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application.- <br /> [3/ ❑ 5.5 The attachmentsla ntain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By- Reviewed Date: �y <br /> EHD 26-01 Pagel of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> L <br />