My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005935 SSCRPT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LONE TREE
>
25744
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600083
>
SU0005935 SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:55 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 11:02:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SU0005935
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600083
STREET_NUMBER
25744
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LONE TREE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
APN
22908075
ENTERED_DATE
2/28/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
25744 E LONE TREE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
2/28/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LONE TREE\25744\PA-0600083\SU0005935\SSC RPT.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ <br /> A 30 X 25 foot area centered on the impacted area at the northern end of the former <br /> tanks, as defined by the earlier Site Assessment sampling, was outlined. A large track <br /> excavator was used to excavate this area. A six yard dump truck periodically <br /> transported contaminated soil to the designated remediation cell at the eastern end of <br /> the property. An AGI geologist monitored the progress of the operation by collecting <br /> frequent grab samples. The samples were tested for the presence of volatile <br /> hydrocarbons using a Flame ionization detector (FID). The samples were placed in a <br /> mason jar for approximately 15 minutes at which time the instrument probe was <br /> inserted to obtain a headspace reading. By using the headspace readings, the <br /> excavation was controlled and clean soils were segregated from impacted soils. <br /> The upper 5 feet of soil excavated consisted of uncontaminated native soil and loose <br /> — sandy fill material. This material was stockpiled on the southwestern portion of the <br /> excavated site and segregated away from the impacted soil. <br /> The contaminated soil mass was encountered at approximately 5 feet. The excavation <br /> was subsequently carried to 35 feet where field measurements indicated all <br /> significantly impacted soils were removed. Laterally, contaminated soils were <br /> confined to a 35 X 31 foot area. The location of the excavation relative to other site <br /> features and the aerial limits of impacted soils is shown on the Exhibit 2. A plot plan <br /> and a three dimensional representation of the completed excavation is provided on <br /> Exhibit 3. Volumetric calculations indicated that 840 cubic yards of contaminated soil <br /> was excavated. In addition to the unimpacted soil stockpiled on-site, supplemental <br /> clean fill in the amount of 800 yards was required to backfill the excavation. <br /> Once the walls and bottom of the excavation were deemed clean, the walls and base, <br /> with the exception of the south wall of the cavity, were sampled in the presence of the <br /> San Joaquin Environmental Health inspector, Michael Collins. The south wall was <br /> sampled approximately two hours later when access allowed sample collection. The <br /> excavation was then backfilled with imported clean fill. During the time when the <br /> excavation was left open, the site was secured with temporary fencing. <br /> 5.0 CONFIRMATION SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> _ Confirmation samples were collected, one from each wall of the excavation at varying <br /> depths dependent on accessibility by excavator. A bottom sample was also obtained <br /> from the center of the pit at a depth of 35 feet. Sample locations are depicted on the <br /> Excavation Plot Plan Exhibit 3. Samples were collected in brass sleeves from the <br /> excavator bucket, close to the teeth to insure that relatively undisturbed samples were <br /> taken. The samples were immediately sealed with taped teflon-lined caps, labeled <br /> and placed in a cooler for later transport to the Smith Emery Company, a State of <br /> California certified laboratory under chain of custody control. The samples were <br /> analyzed for the aromatic components benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes <br /> (BTEX) and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd). Laboratory results are <br /> 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.