Laserfiche WebLink
KLEINFELDER <br /> Several methods exist to moisture condition the expansive clay soils. Generally, if construction <br /> is performed during the winter or early spring months, December through April, the surface and <br /> near-surface soils are usually adequately moisture conditioned because of rainfall. However, if <br /> moisture conditioning is necessary, long-term sprinkling, with dikes to control runoff, generally <br /> produces uniform results. This method can take time however, often on the order of several <br /> days. If this alternative is selected, we recommend that moisture conditioning be performed no <br /> more than three days prior to the placement of nonexpansive Engineered Fill, floor slabs, and/or <br /> exterior concrete flatwork. <br /> Moisture tests should be taken prior to placement of the moisture vapor barrier and reinforcing <br /> steel to confirm that the elevated moisture content has been achieved. We stress that weather <br /> conditions, i.e., temperature, wind, humidity, etc., at the time of moisture conditioning will have <br /> an impact on the amount of time allowed between moisture conditioning and floor slab <br /> placement. Generally, moisture tests should be taken no more than three days prior to floor slab <br /> placement. However, in hot and/or windy weather moisture tests should be taken no more than <br /> approximately 24 hours prior to floor slab placement. We recommend our firm be contacted <br /> prior to moisture conditioning in order to provide consultation regarding the time frame for <br /> moisture testing. <br /> It is important that the subgrade soils under exterior concrete flatwork be moisture conditioned in <br /> the same manner as recommended for floor slabs. Moisture conditioning should extend at least 2 <br /> feet beyond flatwork outlines. It is also recommended that exterior flatwork be placed in <br /> approximately square patterns not more than approximately 200 square feet in size. Suitable <br /> divider strips or other appropriate methods should be used at placement joints. Positive drainage <br /> away from concrete flatwork should also be provided. <br /> IX. SUMMARY OF GEOLOGIC HAZARDS <br /> The site is not located within a fault rupture hazard zone as delineated by the Alquist-Priolo <br /> Earthquake Zoning Act, and no known active faults traverse the site or surrounding area. The <br /> California Division of Mines and Geology (DMG) suggests a maximum peak ground <br /> acceleration of at least 0.20g be assumed for anywhere in the valley. A "Probabilistic Seismic <br /> Hazard Map" published by DMG indicates there is a 10 percent probability that the site will <br /> realize a peak horizontal ground acceleration of between .10g and 0.20g within 50 years. <br /> On the basis of our experience in this area and on our review of available literature, the <br /> residential structures should, as a minimum, be designed to meet seismic requirements stipulated <br /> by the current Uniform Building Code(UBC) for Seismic Zone 3. The site coefficient according <br /> to UBC Table 16-J is SD- <br /> 20-4280-0 I.GO I 12019R 150 <br /> D.20-4280-01.G01/2019R150 Page 8 of 12 <br /> Copyright 1999 Kleinfelder,Inc. April 14, 1999 <br />