My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008100_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
17239
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000031
>
SU0008100_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 2:24:49 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 11:05:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0008100
PE
2625
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000031
STREET_NUMBER
17239
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
ESCALON
APN
20321016
ENTERED_DATE
2/16/2010 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17239 E LOUISE AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
2/12/2010 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LOUISE\17239\PA1000031\SU0008100\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> EI-4 VIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 600 East Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> Telephone. 209 468-3420 Fax: 209 464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/chd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> �P� <br /> SITE LOCATION: PAM�3 y �� 1 � �' / � <br /> REPORT DATE:'�',t h>' L3 zz <br /> 1 <br /> S = sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description offtthe chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> R\ ❑ 1.2 Descriptio of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate andlor any other <br /> i <br /> constituent identified for the project site. <br />'I 2.0 GROUNDWA4ER ANALYSIS <br /> E]_ ❑ 2.1 Description of.depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> Sc c ''55,5 <br /> Q E] 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. g, S55, <br /> a❑ ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. X55 <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER 5 —(2- <br /> 3.1 <br /> (z3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> 7 r rz <br /> ET ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. ,rte.12- <br /> 3.4 <br /> Z3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. g _l Z <br /> ® ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model,if applicable. <br />` ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading frpm site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total prate impact from proposed project. <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the mes proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the proiect site <br /> i <br /> i 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> [� ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ® ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in thg report. <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: !v <br /> h� <br /> EHD 26-02 Pagel of 2 Surface@ Sub Checklist <br /> 7/1412003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.