Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> \/ ./ <br /> hammer. The driven liner and SPT samplers also were used in deeper sand layers. <br /> Most clay layers were sampled with a 3.0-in.-O.D. , thin-walled Shelby tube. The <br /> Shelby tubes were pushed by the drill rig's hydraulic ram. Some samples of clay <br /> soils also were recovered with the driven, liner sampler. <br /> Each sample was removed or extruded from the sampler in the field, examined, <br /> and visually classified by our field geologist. Torvane and pocket penetrometer <br /> strength tests were conducted in the field on samples of clayey soils. Represen- <br /> tative portions of each sample were sealed and packaged for transport to our <br /> testing laboratory. <br /> Groundwater was encountered in the borings at about 7 to 11-ft depth. <br /> Because the borings were drilled to penetrations extending below ground- <br /> water, the borings were permitted, as required by local regulations, with the San <br /> Joaquin Local Health District. At the end of each day, that day's boreholes were <br /> backfilled by filling the borehole from bottom to the ground surface with a <br /> pumped Volclay grout. The grouting operation was witnessed by an inspector from <br /> the Local Health District. <br /> The descriptions of the materials encountered in the borings are presented <br /> on the boring logs, Plates 3 through 9. These boring logs are based on the field <br /> logs, visual inspection of the samples obtained, and laboratory test results. A <br /> description of most of the terms and symbols used on the boring logs is provided <br /> on Plate 10. <br /> Field Electrical Resistivity Survey <br /> Field electrical resistivity measurements were conducted in December 1988 at <br /> three locations (ER-1 through ER-3) as shown on Plate 2. Two locations (ER-1 and <br /> ER-2) were in the southern area of the site. A third location (ER-3) was in the <br /> northeastern area. <br /> The field electrical resistivity measurements were conducted with a Vibro- <br /> ground, Model 293 instrument in conjunction with a 4-pin, equal electrode spac- <br /> ing, Wenner configuration, in accordance with ASTM 57-78. Electrode spacings <br /> ranged from 3 to 12 feet with an equal spacing increment of 3 feet. Testing was <br /> done over relatively flat ground, except where the ground surface was hummocky. <br /> Ground undulations rarely exceeded 1 foot but occasionally were larger than 2 <br /> feet. <br /> In addition to the three surface measurements, one measurement was made for <br /> comparison, across a glass pile, to the south of the "plant" area. The glass <br /> 1144A/CC-5 p McClelland <br />