Laserfiche WebLink
v I..i <br /> Item No. 3 <br /> PC : 5-18-89 <br /> UP-89-22 <br /> Page 12 <br /> The Division commented at the Site Approval stage only. Refer to <br /> "Conditions of Approval . " <br /> Buildincf Inspection Division (most current response, 1-27-88) : <br /> The Division has responded with general information regarding the <br /> requirements for obtaining a grading permit . <br /> As of May 2 , 1989, the following agencies have not responded to <br /> the Use Permit referral : <br /> PG&E Lathrop County Water District <br /> LAFCO Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Manteca-Lathrop Fire District Supervisorial District 1 <br /> Continental Telephone County Counsel <br /> County Assessor <br /> The following State agencies were sent copies of the Initial <br /> Study and the proposed Negative Declaration via the State <br /> Clearinghouse . Those that sent replies are marked with an <br /> asterisk. The actual comments received from these agencies are <br /> included as Attachment 2 . <br /> Department of Conservation Department of Water Resources <br /> Energy Commission* State Lands Commission <br /> Air Resources Board Solid Waste Management Board <br /> Regional Water Quality Water Quality <br /> Control Board, Region 5 Aeronautics <br /> Department of Health Services Attorney General* <br /> Division of Mines and Geology Department of Oil and Gas <br /> APPLICATION DATA <br /> A legal ad of the public hearing was published in the Stockton <br /> Record on 5-8-89 . <br /> No . of public hearing notices mailed: 121 . Date: 5-5-89 . <br /> The staff report was prepared by Kerry Sullivan. <br />