My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005354
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOWER SACRAMENTO
>
26414
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-93-02
>
SU0005354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2020 12:10:32 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 11:09:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005354
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-93-02
STREET_NUMBER
26414
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
LOWER SACRAMENTO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
ENTERED_DATE
8/30/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26414 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\26414\SU-93-02\SU0005354\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\26414\SU-93-02\SU0005354\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\26414\SU-93-02\SU0005354\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JONATHAN McGLADDERY <br /> ATTORNEY AT LAW <br /> 420 WEST PINE STREET, SUITE #2 <br /> LODI, CALIFORNIA 95240-2024 <br /> (209) 334.4109 <br /> December 15, 2000 <br /> RECRVED <br /> MONTE SEIBEL JAN 2 2001 <br /> 221 West Oak Street <br /> Lodi, CA 95240 <br /> Re M.C. Silva Estates Subdivision <br /> Dear Mr. Seibel: <br /> Claudia Silva contacted me late on Thursday to let me know that the occupants of the dairy <br /> located at 26609 North Highway 99 Frontage Road in Acampo need to be off the premises before <br /> all the necessary work can continue on the subdivision. <br /> I have prepared a three-day notice for Jason and Lisa Rocha and have transmitted it to my <br /> process service to be served today. They are more than three months' delinquent on rent and we <br /> have been serving them three-day notices since the summer. They have yet to become current <br /> so I do not think they will be paid in full before the notice expires on Monday at 5 p.m. I will <br /> be mailing them a letter Monday outlining some of their options. If they do not become current, <br /> Claudia has instructed me to proceed with an unlawful detainer. If they do become current, I <br /> will be serving a 30-day notice to terminate the month-to-month tenancy. There is no written <br /> lease. <br /> After the complaint is filed, the parties are served. They then have five days from the time <br /> service is completed to file an answer. If no answer is filed, we apply to the court for a <br /> judgment and the sheriff then evicts. If an answer is filed, the matter is set for trial. Upon a <br /> favorable judgment, the sheriff evicts. If they choose not to leave voluntarily, the earliest they <br /> could be evicted would probably be December 29, depending on the sheriffs schedule. If we <br /> go to trial, then you would add about three weeks. If they did become current, and I really do <br /> not see that as a strong possibility, then the process could go into February because the 30 days <br /> would not expire until late January. Once they are evicted, there will not be another tenant for <br /> the dairy. <br /> If you have any questions please call me. Per Claudia's authorization, you may show this letter <br /> to the planning authorities. <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> Q��Q��, <br /> ONATHAN McGLADDERY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.