My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006056_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
10800
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600190
>
SU0006056_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:59:59 PM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:31:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006056
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600190
STREET_NUMBER
10800
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22803024
ENTERED_DATE
5/23/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
10800 E HWY 120
RECEIVED_DATE
5/23/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\O\HWY 120\10800\PA-0600190\SU0006056\NL_SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Due to the fact the imported loam material will have a significant silt percentage, there is the <br /> potential for the soil-effluent interface to "silt-over" and hinder or prevent the infiltration of septic <br /> effluent. Consequently, a 2.5 inch layer of washed sand(not on-site native sand material)must be <br /> placed on top of the imported loam(silt)material,with the Infiltrator Chambers placed on top of the <br /> wash sand bed. <br /> Care must be given to the imported silt material and washed sand bedding. This material should not <br /> be mechanically compacted; however, it should not be loose. If the material is too loose, as effluent <br /> percolates through this material, it could compact to an extent that may damage the piping system. <br /> Hardpan stratum was not encountered in the deep drilling procedures. It is highly unlikely that a <br /> restrictive stratum exists down to the water table depth at approximately 20.5 ft. <br /> NLS§4. �,S S§ 6rom the soil chemistry test results, it appears that denitrification potential <br /> wild evere restn5led due to the sandy soil structure. However, as explained above, there <br /> should be some mtrafe loading mitigation potential by the importation of the silty loam material. <br /> The denitrification potential in combination with comparatively shallow-rooted landscape plants in <br /> the filter bed area should also reduce nitrate impact by evapotranspiring and mineralizing a <br /> percentage of the effluent during favorable weather times of the year(i.e.,April through <br /> September). <br /> The well water analytical chemistry results obtained from the on-site domestic well indicate that the <br /> nitrate impact to the underlying aquifers is not as high as would be expected. This assumption is <br /> based upon the large agricultural production land area directly upgradient to the project site. This <br /> lower-than-expected nitrate concentration may be attributable to substantial clay strata above the <br /> aquifer(s) from the depth of the well intake, or a high denitrification potential within the underlying <br /> aquifers. <br /> SSS§ 6.8. The Average Daily Flow is calculated to1 4 gals/day from the Office Building. The <br /> Applicat' n Rate at the native soil-effluent interface i 1. Is/ft/day based upon the obtained perc <br /> rate of 1.6 in/in at the 36 inch depth. However,the ifilpo ed loam material should possess a perc <br /> rate of roximately 25 min/in,which should translate to Application Rate of approximately 0.593 <br /> gals/ft'/day. <br /> NLS§4.1 The nitrate loading potential c (Mate Page 12 indicates the percolating effluent <br /> may have a resultant nitrate concentration of 6.2 ppm which is below the drinking water Maximum <br /> 'Contaminant Level f tL). The underlyin ound ater aquifers contain a nitrate concentration of <br /> approxima y 27.8 nitrate. Consequently, a recharge effluent water should theoretically add <br /> a dilution e o the aquifers that were tested. This is theoretical and based on the assumption <br /> that water table receiving waters eventually percolate into the lower aquifers. The following <br /> information discusses this premise: <br /> Regarding the calculated nitrate-nitrogen loading potential to the underlying groundwater table, it is <br /> important to recognize that when adding one concentration of a solute(i.e.,NO3-N concentration <br /> determined in the effluent recharge) to another concentration of a solute(i.e.,NO3-N concentration <br /> 15 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.