Laserfiche WebLink
NLS 2. .,3.1 SSS 2.9,�.:t!7 Since surrounding properties have been intensely farmed for several <br /> de otential\ -fate con <br /> � ftamination in the underlying groundwater is signific <br /> However, well water obtained directly from the aquifers underlying the property indicate edium <br /> 'nitrate imps . This relatively low concentration may be attributed to the denitrification po tia <br /> hin.the-11t`nderlying aquifers, as referenced. <br /> A potential rise in the water table elevation may be from the cropland surrounding the property to <br /> the east and to the south. Irrigation recharge can have a significant influence on the underlying and <br /> surrounding water table, although in this locale it is my opinion that the rise in the water table <br /> elevation would be minimal due to the sandy nature of the underlying soil at the water table depth. <br /> The critical issue regarding the groundwater elevation is: 1.) There must be sufficient distance <br /> between the soil/effluent interface and the highest anticipated depth to groundwater for sufficient <br /> treatment of effluent to occur,which is generally accepted to be five feet, and 2.) The water table <br /> cannot encroach upon the septic tanks, which may cause buoyancy. These two issues are <br /> inconsequential to this project. <br /> NS§ 2.3 .SSS§ 4.3,4.4,4.5. As referenced, there a two xisting wells on the-property; the <br /> sar�le omestic well and art irrigation well. There is no ectricity to the*j well d therefore, <br /> was not sampled: On-May 9, 2007, the domestic well sampled under theTollowing <br /> procedures: The domestic well had been running for three hours because it was pumping to <br /> irrigate the small ag production acreage. Consequently, aquifer water and not stagnant well water <br /> was sampled. Well water was sampled from a sampling port on top of the well casing. A one pint <br /> plastic bottle was used for the nitrate analysis and a 100 ml plastic bottle was used for the , <br /> bacteriological sample. <br /> Thes_twc sample containers were placed in a cooled ice chest after sampling, and then transported <br /> to A"Agricultural Laboratories in Modesto under the attached Chain of Custody. As <br /> referenced, the constituents tested were for nitrate and bacteriological (Total and Fecal Coliform), <br /> exclusively, in compliance with EHD's request and under the California Uniform Retail Food <br /> Facilities Law (CURFFL). The following table illustrates the test results: <br /> TABLE 4 <br /> UNDERLYING GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS FROM ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL <br /> ANALYTE LEVEL FOUND MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL(MCL) <br /> Nitrate4�1 mg/L 45 mg/L <br /> Bacteriological: \bsent Absent <br /> Total and Fecal Coliform <br /> fVV <br /> Calculation of Alkalinity Requirement for Nitrification <br /> The nitrate-nitrogen loading calculations on Page 12 are contingent upon the environmental factors <br /> required for nitrification to occur. These conditions include soil pore-space oxygen content, soil <br /> temperature,pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and alkalinity. <br /> Alkalinity in wastewater effluent is derived from the domestic well water supply in addition to the <br /> introduction of wastes. <br /> 6 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />