My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006319_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
10954
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600607
>
SU0006319_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:59:59 PM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:32:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006319
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600607
STREET_NUMBER
10954
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
MANTECA
APN
22803025
ENTERED_DATE
11/15/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
10954 E HWY 120
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\O\HWY 120\10954\PA-0600607\SU0006319\SS_NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENMIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTNMNT <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, 3`d Floor, Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br /> . '- Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: �D�j t� D / �" 56 PA#: <br /> H GCOL REPORT DATE: <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> t = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> R ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. i <br /> ® ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> E ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> E ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. (� � <br /> ® ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. q <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> [v� ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. G <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site.9� <br /> ® ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. r�i 10 )/-// <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. P /' <br /> ] ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. 6-�1 ( <br /> ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. 1 <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> © ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project.fj <br /> a ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site.kl <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> Q ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional.a M <br /> ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: � "o r Reviewed Date: <br /> ERD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Surface @ Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.