My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011793_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
11150
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800112
>
SU0011793_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 4:00:00 PM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:32:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0011793
PE
2691
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800112
STREET_NUMBER
11150
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336-
APN
22803028
ENTERED_DATE
5/10/2018 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11150 E HWY 120
RECEIVED_DATE
5/8/2018 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\O\HWY 120\11150\PA-1800112\SU0011793\SS_NL STUDY .PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�Aa U I N' SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> z ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> Telephofre: (209)468-3420 Fax: (209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> \i fi old/ <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> PA#: <br /> SITE LOCATION: <br /> REPORT DATE: <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> 1 = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. 133, S pr�4.'cr- 1 5 <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. Pej 13 <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> JR ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> 5.u1-,.6'A 1.4. 1 <br /> [k ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. .1'=c,hob n 14•L <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project.ph ,r1 <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ® ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. Pn J Ll <br /> © ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. V / <br /> 50 ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. po i h <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. 1. 3 7 <br /> 5*_-�k— <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. P, 7 <br /> ® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. TC4 b)e <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> t& ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. 1>t)I I <br /> ® ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or anv other constituent of concern, at and/or around the prosect site. p3 t7 <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> f ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: AV 0.wv- Reviewed Date: • 3 h <br /> EHD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.